Mailosaur vs FakeSMTP

Struggling to choose between Mailosaur and FakeSMTP? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Mailosaur is a Development solution with tags like email, testing, automation.

It boasts features such as Email testing, Email automation, Provides disposable email addresses, API for programmatic access, Web interface to view received emails, Ability to search and filter emails, Extract data and attachments from emails, Automated email workflows for testing, Spam filtering and pros including Easy automated email testing, No need to set up SMTP servers, Scalable to handle large email volumes, Saves time over manual email testing, Detailed email analytics and reporting, Integrates with various test frameworks, Flexible and customizable via API.

On the other hand, FakeSMTP is a Development product tagged with smtp, email, testing, fake, server.

Its standout features include Runs as a local SMTP server that receives email messages, Allows sending email messages to it during development for testing, Does not actually send the emails out, just captures them locally, Lightweight and easy to install, Works cross-platform on Windows, Linux and Mac, Open source and free, and it shines with pros like No need to connect to a real SMTP server during development, Avoids sending test emails accidentally to real users, Saves time by speeding up email testing, Simple to set up and use, Being open source allows customization if needed.

Feature	Mailosaur	FakeSMTP
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

Mailosaur

Description: Mailosaur is an email testing and automation platform for developers. It allows you to easily catch, view, and test emails from your web app by providing an email address to your app. Mailosaur makes it easy to test email sending, monitor email contents, extract data from emails, and automate email workflows for testing.

FakeSMTP

Description: FakeSMTP is an open source SMTP test server that allows developers to test email sending from their applications without actually sending emails through an SMTP server. It is lightweight, easy to install, and useful for testing email functionality during development.

Key Features Comparison

Mailosaur Features

• Email testing
• Email automation
• Provides disposable email addresses
• API for programmatic access
• Web interface to view received emails
• Ability to search and filter emails
• Extract data and attachments from emails
• Automated email workflows for testing
• Spam filtering

FakeSMTP Features

• Runs as a local SMTP server that receives email messages
• Allows sending email messages to it during development for testing
• Does not actually send the emails out, just captures them locally
• Lightweight and easy to install
• Works cross-platform on Windows, Linux and Mac
• Open source and free

Pros & Cons Analysis

Mailosaur

Pros

• Easy automated email testing
• No need to set up SMTP servers
• Scalable to handle large email volumes
• Saves time over manual email testing
• Detailed email analytics and reporting
• Integrates with various test frameworks
• Flexible and customizable via API

Cons

• Can get expensive for large email volumes
• Limited number of email addresses on lower tiers
• No ability to send outbound emails
• No email delivery guarantees
• Not suitable for actual email inbox hosting

FakeSMTP

Pros

• No need to connect to a real SMTP server during development
• Avoids sending test emails accidentally to real users
• Saves time by speeding up email testing
• Simple to set up and use
• Being open source allows customization if needed

Cons

• Limited to testing email sending, not receiving
• Not a full email test platform with reporting
• Requires rerouting application to use it instead of normal SMTP
• Does not test actual email deliverability

Pricing Comparison

Mailosaur

• Freemium
• Subscription-Based

FakeSMTP

• Open Source
• Free