Mailtrap vs FakeSMTP

Struggling to choose between Mailtrap and FakeSMTP? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Mailtrap is a Development solution with tags like email, smtp, testing, development.

It boasts features such as Easy to set up and use, Fake SMTP server to test emails without sending them, Web and API access to view received test emails, Team collaboration features, Email templates and attachments, Email delivery scheduling, Email tracking and analytics and pros including No need to worry about spamming real users during testing, Can test email functionality early in development process, Collaborate with team members on email tests, Good analytics on email opens/clicks, API access allows automation of tests.

On the other hand, FakeSMTP is a Development product tagged with smtp, email, testing, fake, server.

Its standout features include Runs as a local SMTP server that receives email messages, Allows sending email messages to it during development for testing, Does not actually send the emails out, just captures them locally, Lightweight and easy to install, Works cross-platform on Windows, Linux and Mac, Open source and free, and it shines with pros like No need to connect to a real SMTP server during development, Avoids sending test emails accidentally to real users, Saves time by speeding up email testing, Simple to set up and use, Being open source allows customization if needed.

Feature	Mailtrap	FakeSMTP
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

Mailtrap

Description: Mailtrap is an email testing and fake SMTP service for developers. It allows sending and receiving email messages without actually delivering them, useful for testing email functionality in applications under development.

FakeSMTP

Description: FakeSMTP is an open source SMTP test server that allows developers to test email sending from their applications without actually sending emails through an SMTP server. It is lightweight, easy to install, and useful for testing email functionality during development.

Key Features Comparison

Mailtrap Features

• Easy to set up and use
• Fake SMTP server to test emails without sending them
• Web and API access to view received test emails
• Team collaboration features
• Email templates and attachments
• Email delivery scheduling
• Email tracking and analytics

FakeSMTP Features

• Runs as a local SMTP server that receives email messages
• Allows sending email messages to it during development for testing
• Does not actually send the emails out, just captures them locally
• Lightweight and easy to install
• Works cross-platform on Windows, Linux and Mac
• Open source and free

Pros & Cons Analysis

Mailtrap

Pros

• No need to worry about spamming real users during testing
• Can test email functionality early in development process
• Collaborate with team members on email tests
• Good analytics on email opens/clicks
• API access allows automation of tests

Cons

• Limited number of emails allowed on free tier
• No ability to send to real email addresses
• Email inbox UI is basic
• Lacks some advanced email features like SPF/DKIM

FakeSMTP

Pros

• No need to connect to a real SMTP server during development
• Avoids sending test emails accidentally to real users
• Saves time by speeding up email testing
• Simple to set up and use
• Being open source allows customization if needed

Cons

• Limited to testing email sending, not receiving
• Not a full email test platform with reporting
• Requires rerouting application to use it instead of normal SMTP
• Does not test actual email deliverability

Pricing Comparison

Mailtrap

• Freemium
• Subscription-Based

FakeSMTP

• Open Source
• Free