Manjaro Linux vs Antergos

Struggling to choose between Manjaro Linux and Antergos? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Manjaro Linux is a Os & Utilities solution with tags like open-source, arch-linuxbased, user-friendly, automatic-hardware-detection, graphical-installer.

It boasts features such as Rolling release model provides latest software versions, Access to Arch User Repository (AUR) for additional software, User-friendly installer and graphical tools for system configuration, Pre-installed desktop environments like Xfce, KDE Plasma, and GNOME, Automatic hardware detection, Supports multiple kernel options, Based on Arch Linux but with additional user-friendly tools, Supports Snap and Flatpak application formats and pros including Very user-friendly installation process, Latest software through rolling release model, Good hardware support and auto-detection, Access to AUR provides huge software selection, Multiple desktop environment options.

On the other hand, Antergos is a Os & Utilities product tagged with arch-linux, user-friendly, graphical-installer, rolling-release.

Its standout features include Uses Arch Linux as base, Offers graphical installer for easy installation, Access to Arch User Repository (AUR) for installing additional software, Uses GNOME desktop environment by default, Rolling release model - always up to date software, Highly customizable, and it shines with pros like Very user-friendly compared to vanilla Arch Linux, Latest software versions available through rolling release model, Large software selection via AUR, Very customizable desktop environment and settings.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Manjaro Linux

Manjaro Linux

Manjaro Linux is an open source, user-friendly GNU/Linux distribution based on Arch Linux. It provides an accessible introduction to Linux users, with automatic hardware detection and intuitive graphical installers to set up the operating system quickly.

Categories:
open-source arch-linuxbased user-friendly automatic-hardware-detection graphical-installer

Manjaro Linux Features

  1. Rolling release model provides latest software versions
  2. Access to Arch User Repository (AUR) for additional software
  3. User-friendly installer and graphical tools for system configuration
  4. Pre-installed desktop environments like Xfce, KDE Plasma, and GNOME
  5. Automatic hardware detection
  6. Supports multiple kernel options
  7. Based on Arch Linux but with additional user-friendly tools
  8. Supports Snap and Flatpak application formats

Pricing

  • Free
  • Open Source

Pros

Very user-friendly installation process

Latest software through rolling release model

Good hardware support and auto-detection

Access to AUR provides huge software selection

Multiple desktop environment options

Cons

Less documentation than more established distros

Rolling release can sometimes introduce bugs or instability

Manual intervention sometimes needed for updates

Not as lightweight as Arch Linux


Antergos

Antergos

Antergos is an Arch Linux-based distribution featuring a graphical installer. It aims to provide a user-friendly experience while still giving access to the Arch repositories and system.

Categories:
arch-linux user-friendly graphical-installer rolling-release

Antergos Features

  1. Uses Arch Linux as base
  2. Offers graphical installer for easy installation
  3. Access to Arch User Repository (AUR) for installing additional software
  4. Uses GNOME desktop environment by default
  5. Rolling release model - always up to date software
  6. Highly customizable

Pricing

  • Free
  • Open Source

Pros

Very user-friendly compared to vanilla Arch Linux

Latest software versions available through rolling release model

Large software selection via AUR

Very customizable desktop environment and settings

Cons

Less documentation available compared to Arch

Potential stability issues due to rolling release model

Requires some Linux knowledge for troubleshooting issues

Not as lightweight as vanilla Arch