Manjaro Linux vs MX Linux

Struggling to choose between Manjaro Linux and MX Linux? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Manjaro Linux is a Os & Utilities solution with tags like open-source, arch-linuxbased, user-friendly, automatic-hardware-detection, graphical-installer.

It boasts features such as Rolling release model provides latest software versions, Access to Arch User Repository (AUR) for additional software, User-friendly installer and graphical tools for system configuration, Pre-installed desktop environments like Xfce, KDE Plasma, and GNOME, Automatic hardware detection, Supports multiple kernel options, Based on Arch Linux but with additional user-friendly tools, Supports Snap and Flatpak application formats and pros including Very user-friendly installation process, Latest software through rolling release model, Good hardware support and auto-detection, Access to AUR provides huge software selection, Multiple desktop environment options.

On the other hand, MX Linux is a Os & Utilities product tagged with linux, debian, xfce, fluxbox, lightweight, stable, efficient, multimedia.

Its standout features include Based on Debian Stable, Uses lightweight Xfce desktop environment, Includes Fluxbox as a lightweight alternative desktop, Focus on simplicity, efficiency, and stability, Easy system maintenance tools, Popular multimedia codecs included, Live CD or USB installation, and it shines with pros like Very lightweight and fast, Stable and reliable, Easy to use, Good hardware compatibility, Active community support.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Manjaro Linux

Manjaro Linux

Manjaro Linux is an open source, user-friendly GNU/Linux distribution based on Arch Linux. It provides an accessible introduction to Linux users, with automatic hardware detection and intuitive graphical installers to set up the operating system quickly.

Categories:
open-source arch-linuxbased user-friendly automatic-hardware-detection graphical-installer

Manjaro Linux Features

  1. Rolling release model provides latest software versions
  2. Access to Arch User Repository (AUR) for additional software
  3. User-friendly installer and graphical tools for system configuration
  4. Pre-installed desktop environments like Xfce, KDE Plasma, and GNOME
  5. Automatic hardware detection
  6. Supports multiple kernel options
  7. Based on Arch Linux but with additional user-friendly tools
  8. Supports Snap and Flatpak application formats

Pricing

  • Free
  • Open Source

Pros

Very user-friendly installation process

Latest software through rolling release model

Good hardware support and auto-detection

Access to AUR provides huge software selection

Multiple desktop environment options

Cons

Less documentation than more established distros

Rolling release can sometimes introduce bugs or instability

Manual intervention sometimes needed for updates

Not as lightweight as Arch Linux


MX Linux

MX Linux

MX Linux is a user-friendly Linux distribution based on Debian Stable. It focuses on simplicity, efficiency, and stability. MX Linux uses the lightweight Xfce desktop environment by default but also offers Fluxbox as a lightweight alternative. It includes handy tools for system maintenance and popular multimedia codecs for convenience.

Categories:
linux debian xfce fluxbox lightweight stable efficient multimedia

MX Linux Features

  1. Based on Debian Stable
  2. Uses lightweight Xfce desktop environment
  3. Includes Fluxbox as a lightweight alternative desktop
  4. Focus on simplicity, efficiency, and stability
  5. Easy system maintenance tools
  6. Popular multimedia codecs included
  7. Live CD or USB installation

Pricing

  • Free
  • Open Source

Pros

Very lightweight and fast

Stable and reliable

Easy to use

Good hardware compatibility

Active community support

Cons

Less bleeding edge than rolling release distros

Limited customization compared to bigger distros

Smaller software repository than Debian