Mattermost vs Gitter

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

Mattermost icon
Mattermost
Gitter icon
Gitter

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between Mattermost and Gitter? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Mattermost is a Social & Communications solution with tags like chat, messaging, team-collaboration, open-source.

It boasts features such as Team messaging, File sharing, Search, Integrations, Cross-platform support and pros including Open source, Self-hosted, Highly customizable, Strong security, Active development community.

On the other hand, Gitter is a Social & Communications product tagged with chat, messaging, collaboration, open-source.

Its standout features include Instant messaging, Public and private chat rooms, GitHub integration, Markdown support, Code snippets, Notifications, Search, Mobile apps, and it shines with pros like Free and open source, Easy to use interface, Great for collaborating on projects, Integrated with GitHub, Active community.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare Mattermost and Gitter?

When evaluating Mattermost versus Gitter, both solutions serve different needs within the social & communications ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

Mattermost and Gitter have established themselves in the social & communications market. Key areas include chat, messaging, team-collaboration.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between Mattermost and Gitter significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include chat, messaging, team-collaboration, open-source.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include chat, messaging and chat, messaging.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between Mattermost and Gitter. You might also explore chat, messaging, team-collaboration for alternative approaches.

Feature Mattermost Gitter
Overall Score N/A N/A
Primary Category Social & Communications Social & Communications
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

Mattermost
Mattermost

Description: Mattermost is an open-source, self-hosted online chat service with file sharing, search and integration capabilities. It supports text, images, videos and custom emojis across PCs and phones with instant notifications.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

Gitter
Gitter

Description: Gitter is an open source instant messaging and chat room system designed for developers and GitHub projects. It allows developers to easily communicate and collaborate on projects.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

Mattermost
Mattermost Features
  • Team messaging
  • File sharing
  • Search
  • Integrations
  • Cross-platform support
Gitter
Gitter Features
  • Instant messaging
  • Public and private chat rooms
  • GitHub integration
  • Markdown support
  • Code snippets
  • Notifications
  • Search
  • Mobile apps

Pros & Cons Analysis

Mattermost
Mattermost
Pros
  • Open source
  • Self-hosted
  • Highly customizable
  • Strong security
  • Active development community
Cons
  • Requires technical expertise to setup and manage
  • Limited native mobile apps
  • Less third-party integrations than proprietary options
Gitter
Gitter
Pros
  • Free and open source
  • Easy to use interface
  • Great for collaborating on projects
  • Integrated with GitHub
  • Active community
Cons
  • Limited features compared to proprietary options
  • Mobile apps could be better
  • No audio/video calling
  • No desktop apps

Pricing Comparison

Mattermost
Mattermost
  • Open Source
  • Self-Hosted
Gitter
Gitter
  • Freemium

Get More Information

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs