MediaGoblin vs Flumotion

Struggling to choose between MediaGoblin and Flumotion? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

MediaGoblin is a Social & Communications solution with tags like photos, videos, audio, documents, decentralized, selfhosted.

It boasts features such as Decentralized media publishing and sharing, Support for images, audio, video and documents, User accounts and permissions, Tagging and collections, Theming and customization, Federation between MediaGoblin instances, Extensible plugin architecture and pros including Open source and free, User owns and controls their data, Avoid censorship and takedowns, Customizable and extensible, Active development community.

On the other hand, Flumotion is a Video & Movies product tagged with streaming, video, live, adaptive, rtsp, rtp.

Its standout features include Live and on-demand streaming, Supports common streaming protocols like RTP, RTSP, HTTP, Adaptive streaming for delivering video at different bitrates, Modular architecture, Built-in monitoring and management console, Supports adding third-party components, Distributed deployment, and it shines with pros like Open source and free, Flexible and modular architecture, Good streaming performance, Built-in monitoring and management, Supports distributed deployment.

Feature	MediaGoblin	Flumotion
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Social & Communications	Video & Movies

Product Overview

MediaGoblin

Description: MediaGoblin is a free, open source media publishing platform that lets anyone host their own server to share photos, videos, audio, and documents. It aims to decentralize media sharing and publishing.

Flumotion

Description: Flumotion is an open source streaming media server software that can stream live or on-demand video over the internet. It supports streaming protocols like RTP and RTSP and allows for adaptive streaming to deliver video content at different bitrates.

Key Features Comparison

MediaGoblin Features

• Decentralized media publishing and sharing
• Support for images, audio, video and documents
• User accounts and permissions
• Tagging and collections
• Theming and customization
• Federation between MediaGoblin instances
• Extensible plugin architecture

Flumotion Features

• Live and on-demand streaming
• Supports common streaming protocols like RTP, RTSP, HTTP
• Adaptive streaming for delivering video at different bitrates
• Modular architecture
• Built-in monitoring and management console
• Supports adding third-party components
• Distributed deployment

Pros & Cons Analysis

MediaGoblin

Pros

• Open source and free
• User owns and controls their data
• Avoid censorship and takedowns
• Customizable and extensible
• Active development community

Cons

• Requires self-hosting
• Limited adoption so far
• Less features than mainstream platforms
• Can be difficult to install and manage

Flumotion

Pros

• Open source and free
• Flexible and modular architecture
• Good streaming performance
• Built-in monitoring and management
• Supports distributed deployment

Cons

• Limited documentation
• Steep learning curve
• Not very beginner friendly
• Limited community support

Pricing Comparison

MediaGoblin

• Open Source

Flumotion

• Open Source