mediaHUMP vs Flickr

Struggling to choose between mediaHUMP and Flickr? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

mediaHUMP is a Media & Entertainment solution with tags like opensource, selfhosted, media-library, video, audio, photo, streaming.

It boasts features such as Organizes personal media libraries, Provides web-based interface to browse, search and play media, Supports video, audio and photo formats, Automatic metadata fetching & tagging, User access management and permissions, Transcoding media files on the fly, Streaming media to various devices, Pluggable architecture to add new features, Self-hosted, runs on your own server and pros including Open source and free, Customizable and extensible, Good community support, Actively developed and maintained.

On the other hand, Flickr is a Photos & Graphics product tagged with photo, image, sharing, hosting, social.

Its standout features include Photo hosting, Video hosting, Image sharing, Social networking, Mobile app, Cloud storage, Print services, Creative tools, Advanced search, Groups/Forums, and it shines with pros like Free basic account, Large photo storage (1TB), Creative editing tools, Active community, Mobile app, Integrates with social media, Useful organization features.

Feature	mediaHUMP	Flickr
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Media & Entertainment	Photos & Graphics

Product Overview

mediaHUMP

Description: mediaHUMP is an open-source, self-hosted media server for managing and streaming personal media libraries. It supports organizing, previewing, and streaming video, audio, and photo files to a variety of devices.

Flickr

Description: Flickr is an image and video hosting website and web services suite that was created by Ludicorp in 2004 and acquired by Yahoo in 2005. It allows users to upload, store, share, and access images and videos for free or by paid subscription.

Key Features Comparison

mediaHUMP Features

• Organizes personal media libraries
• Provides web-based interface to browse, search and play media
• Supports video, audio and photo formats
• Automatic metadata fetching & tagging
• User access management and permissions
• Transcoding media files on the fly
• Streaming media to various devices
• Pluggable architecture to add new features
• Self-hosted, runs on your own server

Flickr Features

• Photo hosting
• Video hosting
• Image sharing
• Social networking
• Mobile app
• Cloud storage
• Print services
• Creative tools
• Advanced search
• Groups/Forums

Pros & Cons Analysis

mediaHUMP

Pros

• Open source and free
• Customizable and extensible
• Good community support
• Actively developed and maintained

Cons

• Can be resource intensive
• Setup and configuration can be complex
• No mobile apps
• Lacks some features of commercial alternatives

Flickr

Pros

• Free basic account
• Large photo storage (1TB)
• Creative editing tools
• Active community
• Mobile app
• Integrates with social media
• Useful organization features

Cons

• Paid subscription for full features
• Some ads with free account
• Limited video length for free users
• No printing services for free users

Pricing Comparison

mediaHUMP

• Open Source

Flickr

• Freemium