Mesosphere DCOS vs Docker Swarm

Struggling to choose between Mesosphere DCOS and Docker Swarm? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Mesosphere DCOS is a Network & Admin solution with tags like container, orchestration, distributed, scalable.

It boasts features such as Distributed systems management, Container orchestration, Service discovery and load balancing, Scalable and resilient architecture, Multi-tenant resource sharing, Built-in monitoring and logging, CLI and GUI for management, Integrations with popular frameworks like Kubernetes and Marathon and pros including Highly scalable and resilient, Efficient resource utilization, Simplified deployment and management, Open source and customizable, Supports modern containerized workloads, Integrated monitoring and logging, Active community and ecosystem.

On the other hand, Docker Swarm is a Development product tagged with clustering, container-orchestration, docker.

Its standout features include Native clustering for Docker, Turns multiple Docker hosts into a single virtual host, Load balancing, Service discovery, Scaling services across hosts, Rolling updates, Health checks and failover, and it shines with pros like Easy clustering of Docker containers, Horizontal scaling, High availability, Load balancing out of the box, Rolling updates with zero downtime, Built-in service discovery.

Feature	Mesosphere DCOS	Docker Swarm
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Network & Admin	Development

Product Overview

Mesosphere DCOS

Description: Mesosphere DCOS is an open source distributed operating system based on Apache Mesos that manages computer clusters and facilitates container orchestration and services using Marathon, Kubernetes, DC/OS itself. It provides resource efficiency, scalability, and ease of management for distributed workloads.

Docker Swarm

Description: Docker Swarm is a native clustering solution for Docker containers that turns a group of Docker engines into a single virtual Docker engine. It allows users to manage multiple Docker hosts as a cluster and deploy services across the cluster.

Key Features Comparison

Mesosphere DCOS Features

• Distributed systems management
• Container orchestration
• Service discovery and load balancing
• Scalable and resilient architecture
• Multi-tenant resource sharing
• Built-in monitoring and logging
• CLI and GUI for management
• Integrations with popular frameworks like Kubernetes and Marathon

Docker Swarm Features

• Native clustering for Docker
• Turns multiple Docker hosts into a single virtual host
• Load balancing
• Service discovery
• Scaling services across hosts
• Rolling updates
• Health checks and failover

Pros & Cons Analysis

Mesosphere DCOS

Pros

• Highly scalable and resilient
• Efficient resource utilization
• Simplified deployment and management
• Open source and customizable
• Supports modern containerized workloads
• Integrated monitoring and logging
• Active community and ecosystem

Cons

• Complex initial setup
• Steep learning curve
• Requires expertise to operate and troubleshoot
• Not ideal for small or simple workloads
• Upgrades can be disruptive
• Limited Windows support

Docker Swarm

Pros

• Easy clustering of Docker containers
• Horizontal scaling
• High availability
• Load balancing out of the box
• Rolling updates with zero downtime
• Built-in service discovery

Cons

• More complex than standalone Docker
• Requires Docker Engine on each node
• Not as feature rich as Kubernetes
• Limited metrics and logging

Pricing Comparison

Mesosphere DCOS

• Open Source
• Enterprise Edition (Subscription)

Docker Swarm

• Open Source