Micro Focus ALM vs Squash TM

Struggling to choose between Micro Focus ALM and Squash TM? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Micro Focus ALM is a Development solution with tags like requirements-management, test-management, defect-tracking, release-management.

It boasts features such as Requirements management, Test case management, Defect tracking, Release management, Traceability across SDLC, Reporting and dashboards, Test automation integration, Collaboration and workflow, Scalable for enterprise-level projects, Customizable for specific needs and pros including Comprehensive solution for QA and testing, Improved visibility and traceability, Streamlined software development lifecycle, Supports agile and waterfall methodologies, Robust reporting and analytics capabilities, Integrates with various tools and technologies.

On the other hand, Squash TM is a Development product tagged with test-management, test-case-management, bug-tracking, reporting, dashboards.

Its standout features include Test case management, Test run management, Bug/defect tracking, Customizable workflows, Reporting and analytics, Integration with JIRA, Collaboration tools, and it shines with pros like Intuitive interface, Powerful filtering and search, Customizable workflows, Integrations with popular tools, Good value for money.

Feature	Micro Focus ALM	Squash TM
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

Micro Focus ALM

Description: Micro Focus ALM is a software quality management and test automation tool used by QA teams to manage requirements, tests, defects and releases. It provides traceability across the software development lifecycle.

Squash TM

Description: Squash TM is a test management tool that helps software teams manage the software testing process. It features test case organization and filtering, bug tracking, reporting, custom workflows and dashboards.

Key Features Comparison

Micro Focus ALM Features

• Requirements management
• Test case management
• Defect tracking
• Release management
• Traceability across SDLC
• Reporting and dashboards
• Test automation integration
• Collaboration and workflow
• Scalable for enterprise-level projects
• Customizable for specific needs

Squash TM Features

• Test case management
• Test run management
• Bug/defect tracking
• Customizable workflows
• Reporting and analytics
• Integration with JIRA
• Collaboration tools

Pros & Cons Analysis

Micro Focus ALM

Pros

• Comprehensive solution for QA and testing
• Improved visibility and traceability
• Streamlined software development lifecycle
• Supports agile and waterfall methodologies
• Robust reporting and analytics capabilities
• Integrates with various tools and technologies

Cons

• Steep learning curve for new users
• Complex configuration and setup
• Can be resource-intensive for smaller teams
• Expensive for small to medium-sized businesses
• Limited out-of-the-box customization options

Squash TM

Pros

• Intuitive interface
• Powerful filtering and search
• Customizable workflows
• Integrations with popular tools
• Good value for money

Cons

• Steep learning curve initially
• Mobile app could be better
• Lacks some advanced test management features

Pricing Comparison

Micro Focus ALM

• Subscription-Based

Squash TM

• Subscription-Based