Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing vs Squish GUI Tester

Struggling to choose between Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing and Squish GUI Tester? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing is a Development solution with tags like functional-testing, web-application-testing, mobile-application-testing, test-automation.

It boasts features such as GUI-based test creation, Cross-browser testing, Mobile app testing, API testing, Integrations with CI/CD tools, Scriptless test authoring, Object recognition, Test debugging and pros including Supports multiple protocols and environments, Reusable test components, Headless testing, Parallel test execution, Detailed reporting, Open architecture and extensibility.

On the other hand, Squish GUI Tester is a Development product tagged with gui-testing, test-automation, crossplatform-testing.

Its standout features include Supports multiple scripting languages like JavaScript, Python, Perl, Ruby, Tcl, Cross-platform testing of desktop, mobile and embedded applications, Object mapping and spy features to inspect UI elements, Image-based object recognition using Sikuli, Distributed testing across multiple machines, Integrations with CI/CD pipelines and test management tools, and it shines with pros like Powerful object mapping capabilities, Good for cross-browser testing, Supports many languages and frameworks, Open architecture and API for customization, Headless testing capabilities.

Feature	Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing	Squish GUI Tester
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing

Description: Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing is a software testing tool used for functional, regression, and performance testing of web and mobile applications. It supports a range of protocols and allows for automated test creation and execution.

Squish GUI Tester

Description: Squish GUI Tester is an automated testing tool for graphical user interfaces. It supports various scripting languages and testing frameworks to allow for cross-platform testing of desktop, mobile, and embedded applications.

Key Features Comparison

Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing Features

• GUI-based test creation
• Cross-browser testing
• Mobile app testing
• API testing
• Integrations with CI/CD tools
• Scriptless test authoring
• Object recognition
• Test debugging

Squish GUI Tester Features

• Supports multiple scripting languages like JavaScript, Python, Perl, Ruby, Tcl
• Cross-platform testing of desktop, mobile and embedded applications
• Object mapping and spy features to inspect UI elements
• Image-based object recognition using Sikuli
• Distributed testing across multiple machines
• Integrations with CI/CD pipelines and test management tools

Pros & Cons Analysis

Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing

Pros

• Supports multiple protocols and environments
• Reusable test components
• Headless testing
• Parallel test execution
• Detailed reporting
• Open architecture and extensibility

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Expensive licensing
• Script maintenance can be challenging
• Limited support for some modern web technologies

Squish GUI Tester

Pros

• Powerful object mapping capabilities
• Good for cross-browser testing
• Supports many languages and frameworks
• Open architecture and API for customization
• Headless testing capabilities

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Scripting requires programming knowledge
• Limited support for native mobile app testing
• Only available on Windows and Linux

Pricing Comparison

Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing

• Subscription-Based
• Pay-As-You-Go

Squish GUI Tester

• One-time Purchase
• Subscription-Based