Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing vs TestCraft

Struggling to choose between Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing and TestCraft? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing is a Development solution with tags like functional-testing, web-application-testing, mobile-application-testing, test-automation.

It boasts features such as GUI-based test creation, Cross-browser testing, Mobile app testing, API testing, Integrations with CI/CD tools, Scriptless test authoring, Object recognition, Test debugging and pros including Supports multiple protocols and environments, Reusable test components, Headless testing, Parallel test execution, Detailed reporting, Open architecture and extensibility.

On the other hand, TestCraft is a Development product tagged with test-automation, web-testing, api-testing, mobile-testing, desktop-testing.

Its standout features include Record and playback tests, Cross-browser testing, Reusable test components, CI/CD integration, Visual test editor, Command line runner, Parallel test execution, Custom reporting, Test maintenance suite, Integration with test management tools, and it shines with pros like Easy to learn and use, Supports multiple test types and frameworks, Reusable test components speed up test creation, Parallel execution reduces test cycles, Command line runner enables CI/CD integration, Visual editor for building and managing tests.

Feature	Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing	TestCraft
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing

Description: Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing is a software testing tool used for functional, regression, and performance testing of web and mobile applications. It supports a range of protocols and allows for automated test creation and execution.

TestCraft

Description: TestCraft is a test automation tool that allows users to easily create, manage, and execute automated tests. It provides support for Web, API, mobile, and desktop application testing with a variety of frameworks.

Key Features Comparison

Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing Features

• GUI-based test creation
• Cross-browser testing
• Mobile app testing
• API testing
• Integrations with CI/CD tools
• Scriptless test authoring
• Object recognition
• Test debugging

TestCraft Features

• Record and playback tests
• Cross-browser testing
• Reusable test components
• CI/CD integration
• Visual test editor
• Command line runner
• Parallel test execution
• Custom reporting
• Test maintenance suite
• Integration with test management tools

Pros & Cons Analysis

Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing

Pros

• Supports multiple protocols and environments
• Reusable test components
• Headless testing
• Parallel test execution
• Detailed reporting
• Open architecture and extensibility

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Expensive licensing
• Script maintenance can be challenging
• Limited support for some modern web technologies

TestCraft

Pros

• Easy to learn and use
• Supports multiple test types and frameworks
• Reusable test components speed up test creation
• Parallel execution reduces test cycles
• Command line runner enables CI/CD integration
• Visual editor for building and managing tests

Cons

• Lacks some advanced coding capabilities of open source tools
• Mobile testing requires installation of an app
• Can be expensive for large teams
• Technical support is not 24/7

Pricing Comparison

Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing

• Subscription-Based
• Pay-As-You-Go

TestCraft

• Subscription-Based