MicroDicom vs Horos

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

MicroDicom icon
MicroDicom
Horos icon
Horos

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between MicroDicom and Horos? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

MicroDicom is a Medical solution with tags like dicom, medical-imaging, radiology, viewer.

It boasts features such as DICOM viewer, DICOM image editing, DICOM conversion, DICOM printing, DICOM networking, DICOM worklist, DICOM storage commitment, DICOM structured reporting and pros including Free and open source, Lightweight and fast, Supports many DICOM formats and data, Good image viewing and manipulation tools, Active development and support.

On the other hand, Horos is a Medical product tagged with dicom, radiology, medical-imaging.

Its standout features include DICOM image viewer, 2D & 3D image rendering, Image manipulation tools, Plugin architecture, Export images to JPEG/PNG, Anonymize DICOM files, Send images via email/FTP, Print images, Supports PACS connectivity, and it shines with pros like Open source & free, Cross-platform (Mac, Windows, Linux), Intuitive user interface, Extensive format support, Customizable workflows, Active development community.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare MicroDicom and Horos?

When evaluating MicroDicom versus Horos, both solutions serve different needs within the medical ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

MicroDicom and Horos have established themselves in the medical market. Key areas include dicom, medical-imaging, radiology.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between MicroDicom and Horos significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include dicom, medical-imaging, radiology, viewer.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include dicom, medical-imaging and dicom, radiology.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between MicroDicom and Horos. You might also explore dicom, medical-imaging, radiology for alternative approaches.

Feature MicroDicom Horos
Overall Score N/A N/A
Primary Category Medical Medical
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

MicroDicom
MicroDicom

Description: MicroDicom is free, open-source DICOM viewer software for Windows. It allows viewing, editing and converting medical images in DICOM format. Useful for radiologists, technicians and researchers to visualize and analyze scans.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

Horos
Horos

Description: Horos is an open-source medical image viewer software for DICOM and other medical images. It is designed to be usable for radiologists, clinicians, and patients and supports a wide range of imaging modalities and formats.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

MicroDicom
MicroDicom Features
  • DICOM viewer
  • DICOM image editing
  • DICOM conversion
  • DICOM printing
  • DICOM networking
  • DICOM worklist
  • DICOM storage commitment
  • DICOM structured reporting
Horos
Horos Features
  • DICOM image viewer
  • 2D & 3D image rendering
  • Image manipulation tools
  • Plugin architecture
  • Export images to JPEG/PNG
  • Anonymize DICOM files
  • Send images via email/FTP
  • Print images
  • Supports PACS connectivity

Pros & Cons Analysis

MicroDicom
MicroDicom
Pros
  • Free and open source
  • Lightweight and fast
  • Supports many DICOM formats and data
  • Good image viewing and manipulation tools
  • Active development and support
Cons
  • Limited documentation
  • Less features than paid DICOM software
  • Some bugs and stability issues
  • Steep learning curve for advanced features
Horos
Horos
Pros
  • Open source & free
  • Cross-platform (Mac, Windows, Linux)
  • Intuitive user interface
  • Extensive format support
  • Customizable workflows
  • Active development community
Cons
  • Limited support options
  • Steep learning curve
  • Lacks some advanced visualization tools
  • No built-in reporting features

Pricing Comparison

MicroDicom
MicroDicom
  • Free
  • Open Source
Horos
Horos
  • Open Source

Get More Information

MicroDicom
MicroDicom
MicroDicom
Learn More About MicroDicom
Horos
Horos
Horos
Learn More About Horos

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs

Browse More Software
Back to Homepage
Company
Explore
Resources

Your shortcut to better software.

© 2025 Sugggest.com. All Rights Reserved.
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Cookie Policy Legal