Microsoft Entra ID vs Keycloak

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

Microsoft Entra ID icon
Microsoft Entra ID
Keycloak icon
Keycloak

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between Microsoft Entra ID and Keycloak? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Microsoft Entra ID is a Security & Privacy solution with tags like single-signon, multifactor-authentication, selfservice-password-reset, active-directory, office-365.

It boasts features such as Single sign-on, Multi-factor authentication, Self-service password reset, Role-based access control, Adaptive authentication, Integration with Active Directory and Office 365 and pros including Enhanced security, Increased productivity, Reduced IT costs, Simplified access management, Seamless integration with Microsoft ecosystem.

On the other hand, Keycloak is a Security & Privacy product tagged with authentication, authorization, user-management, open-source.

Its standout features include Single sign-on, Identity brokering and social login, User federation, Client adapters, Admin console, and it shines with pros like Open source, Easy integration, Flexible and customizable, Robust access management capabilities.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare Microsoft Entra ID and Keycloak?

When evaluating Microsoft Entra ID versus Keycloak, both solutions serve different needs within the security & privacy ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

Microsoft Entra ID and Keycloak have established themselves in the security & privacy market. Key areas include single-signon, multifactor-authentication, selfservice-password-reset.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between Microsoft Entra ID and Keycloak significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include single-signon, multifactor-authentication, selfservice-password-reset, active-directory.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include single-signon, multifactor-authentication and authentication, authorization.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between Microsoft Entra ID and Keycloak. You might also explore single-signon, multifactor-authentication, selfservice-password-reset for alternative approaches.

Feature Microsoft Entra ID Keycloak
Overall Score N/A N/A
Primary Category Security & Privacy Security & Privacy
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

Microsoft Entra ID
Microsoft Entra ID

Description: Microsoft Entra ID is an identity and access management (IAM) solution that provides single sign-on, multi-factor authentication, self-service password reset, and more. It integrates with Active Directory and Office 365 to manage identities and access.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

Keycloak
Keycloak

Description: Keycloak is an open source identity and access management solution. It handles authentication, authorization, and user federation and makes it easy to secure applications and services. Keycloak provides out-of-the-box support for popular protocols like OpenID Connect, OAuth 2.0, and SAML 2.0.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

Microsoft Entra ID
Microsoft Entra ID Features
  • Single sign-on
  • Multi-factor authentication
  • Self-service password reset
  • Role-based access control
  • Adaptive authentication
  • Integration with Active Directory and Office 365
Keycloak
Keycloak Features
  • Single sign-on
  • Identity brokering and social login
  • User federation
  • Client adapters
  • Admin console

Pros & Cons Analysis

Microsoft Entra ID
Microsoft Entra ID
Pros
  • Enhanced security
  • Increased productivity
  • Reduced IT costs
  • Simplified access management
  • Seamless integration with Microsoft ecosystem
Cons
  • Complex setup and configuration
  • Steep learning curve
  • Can be expensive for smaller businesses
  • Limited customization options
Keycloak
Keycloak
Pros
  • Open source
  • Easy integration
  • Flexible and customizable
  • Robust access management capabilities
Cons
  • Steep learning curve
  • Complex configuration
  • Limited native reporting capabilities

Pricing Comparison

Microsoft Entra ID
Microsoft Entra ID
  • Subscription-Based
Keycloak
Keycloak
  • Open Source

Get More Information

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs