Microsoft Hyper-V Server vs ZeroStack

Struggling to choose between Microsoft Hyper-V Server and ZeroStack? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Microsoft Hyper-V Server is a System & Hardware solution with tags like hypervisor, virtualization, virtual-machines.

It boasts features such as Hypervisor-based virtualization, Live Migration, Dynamic Memory, RemoteFX, Storage Spaces Direct, Shielded VMs, Storage Replica, Storage QoS and pros including Free and standalone product, Small footprint, Built on Windows Server, Integrates with System Center and Microsoft Azure, Supports Windows and Linux VMs.

On the other hand, ZeroStack is a Development product tagged with open-source, serverless, autoscaling, monitoring, simplified-operations.

Its standout features include Self-driving infrastructure, Built-in monitoring and logging, Auto-scaling, Serverless functions, API gateway, Object storage, Identity and access management, Continuous deployment, and it shines with pros like Simplifies infrastructure management, Reduces operational costs, Enables rapid scaling, Increases developer productivity.

Feature	Microsoft Hyper-V Server	ZeroStack
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	System & Hardware	Development

Product Overview

Microsoft Hyper-V Server

Description: Microsoft Hyper-V Server is a free, standalone product that provides a hypervisor-based virtualization platform for running virtual machines on x64 Windows servers. It has a small footprint and basic management tools.

ZeroStack

Description: ZeroStack is an open source platform that provides serverless infrastructure for developers to build, run and scale applications without managing servers. It offers auto-scaling, built-in monitoring, and simplifies operations.

Key Features Comparison

Microsoft Hyper-V Server Features

• Hypervisor-based virtualization
• Live Migration
• Dynamic Memory
• RemoteFX
• Storage Spaces Direct
• Shielded VMs
• Storage Replica
• Storage QoS

ZeroStack Features

• Self-driving infrastructure
• Built-in monitoring and logging
• Auto-scaling
• Serverless functions
• API gateway
• Object storage
• Identity and access management
• Continuous deployment

Pros & Cons Analysis

Microsoft Hyper-V Server

Pros

• Free and standalone product
• Small footprint
• Built on Windows Server
• Integrates with System Center and Microsoft Azure
• Supports Windows and Linux VMs

Cons

• Limited management tools
• No live storage migration
• No dynamic resizing of VHDX
• Limited to 64 logical processors

ZeroStack

Pros

• Simplifies infrastructure management
• Reduces operational costs
• Enables rapid scaling
• Increases developer productivity

Cons

• Potential vendor lock-in
• Limited customization options
• Not suitable for complex legacy applications

Pricing Comparison

Microsoft Hyper-V Server

• Free

ZeroStack

• Open Source
• Custom Pricing