MinIO vs Seaweed FS

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

MinIO icon
MinIO
Seaweed FS icon
Seaweed FS

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between MinIO and Seaweed FS? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

MinIO is a Network & Admin solution with tags like object-storage, s3, aws, storage.

It boasts features such as Amazon S3 compatible API, High performance object storage, Lightweight and suitable for storing unstructured data, Open source software, Built-in encryption, Erasure coding for data protection, Multi-tenant access with role-based access control, Scalable distributed architecture and pros including Easy to set up and use, Low resource usage, Cost effective compared to other object storage solutions, Very fast performance, Highly scalable and distributed, Strong data protection features, Active open source community support.

On the other hand, Seaweed FS is a File Management product tagged with opensource, distributed, file-storage, scaling, fast.

Its standout features include Distributed file system, Scalable and fast, Fault tolerant, Supports billions of files, Automatic replication, Streaming uploads and downloads, Namespace management, Caching, Erasure coding, Geo-replication, Access control, and it shines with pros like Highly scalable, Great performance, Fault tolerance, Geo-replication for global access, Efficient streaming, Open source with active community.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare MinIO and Seaweed FS?

When evaluating MinIO versus Seaweed FS, both solutions serve different needs within the network & admin ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

MinIO and Seaweed FS have established themselves in the network & admin market. Key areas include object-storage, s3, aws.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between MinIO and Seaweed FS significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include object-storage, s3, aws, storage.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include object-storage, s3 and opensource, distributed.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between MinIO and Seaweed FS. You might also explore object-storage, s3, aws for alternative approaches.

Feature MinIO Seaweed FS
Overall Score N/A N/A
Primary Category Network & Admin File Management
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

MinIO
MinIO

Description: MinIO is an open source object storage server with Amazon S3 compatible API. It is lightweight, high-performance, and suitable for storing unstructured data such as photos, videos, log files, backups, and container images.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

Seaweed FS
Seaweed FS

Description: SeaweedFS is an open-source, distributed file system designed for storing and serving billions of files fast. It spreads files over many servers, allowing for efficient scaling and parallel streaming of data.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

MinIO
MinIO Features
  • Amazon S3 compatible API
  • High performance object storage
  • Lightweight and suitable for storing unstructured data
  • Open source software
  • Built-in encryption
  • Erasure coding for data protection
  • Multi-tenant access with role-based access control
  • Scalable distributed architecture
Seaweed FS
Seaweed FS Features
  • Distributed file system
  • Scalable and fast
  • Fault tolerant
  • Supports billions of files
  • Automatic replication
  • Streaming uploads and downloads
  • Namespace management
  • Caching
  • Erasure coding
  • Geo-replication
  • Access control

Pros & Cons Analysis

MinIO
MinIO
Pros
  • Easy to set up and use
  • Low resource usage
  • Cost effective compared to other object storage solutions
  • Very fast performance
  • Highly scalable and distributed
  • Strong data protection features
  • Active open source community support
Cons
  • Limited ecosystem compared to S3
  • Less out-of-box features than some competitors
  • Can be complex to operate at large scale
  • Lacks native cloud integration
Seaweed FS
Seaweed FS
Pros
  • Highly scalable
  • Great performance
  • Fault tolerance
  • Geo-replication for global access
  • Efficient streaming
  • Open source with active community
Cons
  • Limited user management features
  • Steep learning curve
  • Not beginner friendly
  • Lacks GUI and management tools

Pricing Comparison

MinIO
MinIO
  • Open Source
  • Free Trial
Seaweed FS
Seaweed FS
  • Open Source

Get More Information

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs