MonoTouch vs RubyMotion

Struggling to choose between MonoTouch and RubyMotion? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

MonoTouch is a Development solution with tags like ios, c, net, crossplatform.

It boasts features such as Allows building native iOS apps with C# and .NET, Full access to iOS APIs and frameworks, Reuse existing .NET code libraries, Cross-platform code sharing, Rapid development using Visual Studio tools, Supports latest iOS features and devices and pros including Productivity gains from using C# and .NET, Leverage existing .NET skills and code, Rapid development cycle, Performance on par with Objective-C, Support from Xamarin community.

On the other hand, RubyMotion is a Development product tagged with ruby, ios, android, macos, crossplatform.

Its standout features include Allows writing native iOS, Android and macOS apps in Ruby, Provides access to full native platform APIs, Supports most Ruby gems and libraries, Includes RubyMotion IDE for coding, debugging and profiling, Compiles Ruby code to optimized native code, Integrates with Xcode and Android Studio, and it shines with pros like Write native apps in Ruby instead of Objective-C/Swift or Java/Kotlin, Leverage existing Ruby knowledge and libraries, Rapid development and prototyping, Clean and expressive Ruby syntax, Good performance via compilation to native code, Active community support.

Feature	MonoTouch	RubyMotion
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

MonoTouch

Description: MonoTouch is a software development kit that allows developers to build iOS applications using the C# programming language and .NET APIs. It enables writing native iOS applications while leveraging existing .NET code libraries.

RubyMotion

Description: RubyMotion is a toolchain that allows developers to write native iOS, Android, and macOS applications using the Ruby programming language. It provides a bridge from Ruby to the native APIs of the target platform.

Key Features Comparison

MonoTouch Features

• Allows building native iOS apps with C# and .NET
• Full access to iOS APIs and frameworks
• Reuse existing .NET code libraries
• Cross-platform code sharing
• Rapid development using Visual Studio tools
• Supports latest iOS features and devices

RubyMotion Features

• Allows writing native iOS, Android and macOS apps in Ruby
• Provides access to full native platform APIs
• Supports most Ruby gems and libraries
• Includes RubyMotion IDE for coding, debugging and profiling
• Compiles Ruby code to optimized native code
• Integrates with Xcode and Android Studio

Pros & Cons Analysis

MonoTouch

Pros

• Productivity gains from using C# and .NET
• Leverage existing .NET skills and code
• Rapid development cycle
• Performance on par with Objective-C
• Support from Xamarin community

Cons

• Steep learning curve for iOS development
• Limited debugging support
• Extra cost compared to native tools
• Apps may be larger in size
• Less control compared to native code

RubyMotion

Pros

• Write native apps in Ruby instead of Objective-C/Swift or Java/Kotlin
• Leverage existing Ruby knowledge and libraries
• Rapid development and prototyping
• Clean and expressive Ruby syntax
• Good performance via compilation to native code
• Active community support

Cons

• Less control compared to writing native code directly
• Limited debugging capabilities
• Not all native APIs are available
• Smaller community than native platforms
• May encounter Ruby gems not supported
• Extra cost compared to free native tools

Pricing Comparison

MonoTouch

• Subscription-Based

RubyMotion

• Subscription-Based