Mozilla Public License vs WTFPL

Struggling to choose between Mozilla Public License and WTFPL? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Mozilla Public License is a Development solution with tags like open-source, license, mozilla, source-code.

It boasts features such as Allows reuse and modification of source code, Requires modified versions to use a different name, Requires modified source code to remain open, Permits distribution of larger works without forcing them to be open source and pros including Promotes open source collaboration, Allows customization of existing software, Free to use.

On the other hand, WTFPL is a Development product tagged with opensource, permissive, license.

Its standout features include No restrictions on usage, Can be used for any purpose, Allows modifying and redistributing the code, No attribution required, and it shines with pros like Total freedom to use the software, No need to comply with any license terms, Can be incorporated into proprietary software.

Feature	Mozilla Public License	WTFPL
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

Mozilla Public License

Description: The Mozilla Public License is an open source software license allowing modification and distribution of source code. It requires modified versions to use a different name and their source code to remain open.

WTFPL

Description: The WTFPL (Do What the Fuck You Want to Public License) is an extremely permissive software license that allows users to do anything they want with the software, including modifying, distributing and selling it, without any restrictions.

Key Features Comparison

Mozilla Public License Features

• Allows reuse and modification of source code
• Requires modified versions to use a different name
• Requires modified source code to remain open
• Permits distribution of larger works without forcing them to be open source

WTFPL Features

• No restrictions on usage
• Can be used for any purpose
• Allows modifying and redistributing the code
• No attribution required

Pros & Cons Analysis

Mozilla Public License

Pros

• Promotes open source collaboration
• Allows customization of existing software
• Free to use

Cons

• Lack of warranty from original authors
• Requires attribution
• Incompatible with some other licenses

WTFPL

Pros

• Total freedom to use the software
• No need to comply with any license terms
• Can be incorporated into proprietary software

Cons

• Lack of liability and warranty from original authors
• No requirement to share changes publicly
• Unclear how it interacts with patents

Pricing Comparison

Mozilla Public License

• Open Source

WTFPL

• Open Source