Skip to content

Nethogs vs Shodan

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs.

Nethogs icon
Nethogs
Shodan icon
Shodan

Nethogs vs Shodan: The Verdict

⚡ Summary:

Nethogs: Nethogs is a Linux tool that provides real-time network traffic usage by process. It shows bandwidth usage on a per-process basis in an easy to understand format.

Shodan: Shodan is a search engine for Internet-connected devices. It allows users to find specific types of devices based on filters like location, ports, banners, and more. Shodan provides visibility into Internet-facing devices and services that are often overlooked or forgotten.

Both tools serve their respective audiences. Compare the features, pricing, and user ratings above to determine which best fits your needs.

Last updated: May 2026 · Comparison by Sugggest Editorial Team

Feature Nethogs Shodan
Sugggest Score — —
Category Network & Admin Security & Privacy
Pricing Open Source —

Product Overview

Nethogs
Nethogs

Description: Nethogs is a Linux tool that provides real-time network traffic usage by process. It shows bandwidth usage on a per-process basis in an easy to understand format.

Type: software

Pricing: Open Source

Shodan
Shodan

Description: Shodan is a search engine for Internet-connected devices. It allows users to find specific types of devices based on filters like location, ports, banners, and more. Shodan provides visibility into Internet-facing devices and services that are often overlooked or forgotten.

Type: software

Key Features Comparison

Nethogs
Nethogs Features
  • Monitors bandwidth usage per process in real time
  • Displays network usage in a terminal using a text-based user interface
  • Shows program name, PID, sent/received data, and total usage
  • Can filter processes by name or PID
  • Lightweight and non-intrusive
Shodan
Shodan Features
  • Search engine for Internet-connected devices
  • Find devices based on filters like location, ports, banners, etc
  • Provides visibility into Internet-facing devices and services

Pros & Cons Analysis

Nethogs
Nethogs

Pros

  • Easy to use and understand
  • Provides granular visibility into bandwidth usage
  • Helpful for identifying and troubleshooting network hogs
  • Works on most Linux distributions without setup

Cons

  • Terminal-only interface lacks graphical view
  • Can only monitor bandwidth usage, not other metrics
  • Requires root access to monitor all processes
  • Not well-suited for remote monitoring
Shodan
Shodan

Pros

  • Easy to discover Internet-connected devices
  • Powerful search and filtering capabilities
  • Helps identify vulnerabilities and insecure configurations

Cons

  • Requires paid subscription for full access
  • Some consider scanning without permission unethical
  • Exposes sensitive information about devices

Pricing Comparison

Nethogs
Nethogs
  • Open Source
Shodan
Shodan
  • Not listed

Related Comparisons

HttpCanary
vs Nethogs vs Shodan
IPtraf-ng
vs Nethogs vs Shodan

Learn More About Each Product

Nethogs
Nethogs
Reviews, pricing & alternatives →
Shodan
Shodan
Reviews, pricing & alternatives →

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs

Nethogs Alternatives
Shodan Alternatives
Browse More Software