Nethogs vs Termshark

Struggling to choose between Nethogs and Termshark? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Nethogs is a Network & Admin solution with tags like bandwidth, network, monitoring, linux.

It boasts features such as Monitors bandwidth usage per process in real time, Displays network usage in a terminal using a text-based user interface, Shows program name, PID, sent/received data, and total usage, Can filter processes by name or PID, Lightweight and non-intrusive and pros including Easy to use and understand, Provides granular visibility into bandwidth usage, Helpful for identifying and troubleshooting network hogs, Works on most Linux distributions without setup.

On the other hand, Termshark is a Network & Admin product tagged with terminal, network, protocol, analyzer, packets, cli.

Its standout features include Captures live packet data from network interfaces, Displays packets in a terminal user interface, Filters packets using display filters, Analyzes protocols including TCP, UDP, HTTP, DNS, and more, Supports common capture file formats like PCAP and PCAPNG, Runs natively in Linux terminal without a GUI, Built on top of TShark and Wireshark libraries, and it shines with pros like Lightweight terminal-based interface, No GUI overhead or dependencies, Works over SSH connections, Fast and responsive for analyzing live captures, Powerful display filters, Leverages Wireshark protocol analysis.

Feature	Nethogs	Termshark
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Network & Admin	Network & Admin

Product Overview

Nethogs

Description: Nethogs is a Linux tool that provides real-time network traffic usage by process. It shows bandwidth usage on a per-process basis in an easy to understand format.

Termshark

Description: Termshark is a terminal based network protocol analyzer. It allows you to inspect network traffic and analyze packets, similar to Wireshark, but runs in a terminal instead of a graphical interface.

Key Features Comparison

Nethogs Features

• Monitors bandwidth usage per process in real time
• Displays network usage in a terminal using a text-based user interface
• Shows program name, PID, sent/received data, and total usage
• Can filter processes by name or PID
• Lightweight and non-intrusive

Termshark Features

• Captures live packet data from network interfaces
• Displays packets in a terminal user interface
• Filters packets using display filters
• Analyzes protocols including TCP, UDP, HTTP, DNS, and more
• Supports common capture file formats like PCAP and PCAPNG
• Runs natively in Linux terminal without a GUI
• Built on top of TShark and Wireshark libraries

Pros & Cons Analysis

Nethogs

Pros

• Easy to use and understand
• Provides granular visibility into bandwidth usage
• Helpful for identifying and troubleshooting network hogs
• Works on most Linux distributions without setup

Cons

• Terminal-only interface lacks graphical view
• Can only monitor bandwidth usage, not other metrics
• Requires root access to monitor all processes
• Not well-suited for remote monitoring

Termshark

Pros

• Lightweight terminal-based interface
• No GUI overhead or dependencies
• Works over SSH connections
• Fast and responsive for analyzing live captures
• Powerful display filters
• Leverages Wireshark protocol analysis

Cons

• Less intuitive than GUI-based Wireshark
• Steeper learning curve for terminal usage
• Limited to keyboard-based interaction
• Harder to visualize packet flows
• No built-in statistical summaries

Pricing Comparison

Nethogs

• Open Source

Termshark

• Open Source