Ninja Build vs GNU Make

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

Ninja Build icon
Ninja Build
GNU Make icon
GNU Make

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between Ninja Build and GNU Make? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Ninja Build is a Development solution with tags like compiler, build-system, cc.

It boasts features such as Fast build system, Built-in dependency analysis, Parallel execution, Minimal project configuration, Cross-platform support and pros including Very fast build times, Simple and easy to use, Good for small to medium sized projects, Active development and support.

On the other hand, GNU Make is a Development product tagged with build, automation, make, compiler.

Its standout features include Dependency tracking - Automatically determines dependencies between files, Parallel builds - Can build independent targets simultaneously, Built-in functions - Many built-in functions for common build tasks, Recursive builds - Can build targets in subdirectories recursively, Pattern rules - General rules can be applied based on pattern matching, Conditionals - Supports if/else conditionals in makefiles, and it shines with pros like Widely used and well-supported, Mature and stable, Powerful dependency tracking, Built-in parallelism, Portable across platforms, Integrates well with other tools.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare Ninja Build and GNU Make?

When evaluating Ninja Build versus GNU Make, both solutions serve different needs within the development ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

Ninja Build and GNU Make have established themselves in the development market. Key areas include compiler, build-system, cc.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between Ninja Build and GNU Make significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include compiler, build-system, cc.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include compiler, build-system and build, automation.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between Ninja Build and GNU Make. You might also explore compiler, build-system, cc for alternative approaches.

Feature Ninja Build GNU Make
Overall Score N/A N/A
Primary Category Development Development
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

Ninja Build
Ninja Build

Description: Ninja is a small, fast build system designed for compiling code quickly. It focuses on speed and supports parallel execution for very fast builds using multiple CPU cores.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

GNU Make
GNU Make

Description: GNU Make is a utility that automatically builds executable programs and libraries from source code by reading files called Makefiles which specify how to derive the target program. It allows users to easily compile large projects without manually issuing the compilation commands.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

Ninja Build
Ninja Build Features
  • Fast build system
  • Built-in dependency analysis
  • Parallel execution
  • Minimal project configuration
  • Cross-platform support
GNU Make
GNU Make Features
  • Dependency tracking - Automatically determines dependencies between files
  • Parallel builds - Can build independent targets simultaneously
  • Built-in functions - Many built-in functions for common build tasks
  • Recursive builds - Can build targets in subdirectories recursively
  • Pattern rules - General rules can be applied based on pattern matching
  • Conditionals - Supports if/else conditionals in makefiles

Pros & Cons Analysis

Ninja Build
Ninja Build
Pros
  • Very fast build times
  • Simple and easy to use
  • Good for small to medium sized projects
  • Active development and support
Cons
  • Limited features compared to larger build tools
  • Less customizable than other build tools
  • Lacks GUI or IDE integration
GNU Make
GNU Make
Pros
  • Widely used and well-supported
  • Mature and stable
  • Powerful dependency tracking
  • Built-in parallelism
  • Portable across platforms
  • Integrates well with other tools
Cons
  • Cryptic syntax
  • Difficult for complex builds
  • Only rebuilds out-of-date targets
  • Not suitable for all project types
  • Limited to makefile build process

Pricing Comparison

Ninja Build
Ninja Build
  • Open Source
GNU Make
GNU Make
  • Open Source

Get More Information

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs