NoScript vs uMatrix

Struggling to choose between NoScript and uMatrix? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

NoScript is a Security & Privacy solution with tags like javascript, java, flash, plugins, privacy, security.

It boasts features such as Blocks execution of JavaScript, Java, Flash and other plugins by default, Whitelist-based plugin permission system allows enabling plugins on a per-site basis, Prevents clickjacking, XSS and other web-based attacks, Provides privacy by blocking web trackers and beacons, Lightweight extension with minimal impact on browser performance and pros including Improves security and privacy while browsing the web, Lets user control which sites can run plugins/scripts, Easy to whitelist trusted sites and enable plugins only when needed, Open source code can be audited for security, Free to use with no ads or paid tiers.

On the other hand, uMatrix is a Security & Privacy product tagged with firewall, privacy, security, browser-extension.

Its standout features include Allows granular control over browser requests, Can block scripts, iframes, CSS, images, etc, Prevents cross-site tracking, Forces HTTPS connections, Open source, and it shines with pros like Very customizable, Improves privacy, Enhances security, Lightweight and fast.

Feature	NoScript	uMatrix
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Security & Privacy	Security & Privacy

Product Overview

NoScript

Description: NoScript is a free, open source browser extension for Firefox, Chrome, and other browsers. It allows users to selectively enable and disable JavaScript, Java, Flash and other plugins on a site-by-site basis for security and privacy reasons.

uMatrix

Description: uMatrix is an open-source browser extension for Firefox, Chrome, and Firefox forks. It works as a firewall and allows users to selectively enable and disable various types of requests made by websites for improved security and privacy.

Key Features Comparison

NoScript Features

• Blocks execution of JavaScript, Java, Flash and other plugins by default
• Whitelist-based plugin permission system allows enabling plugins on a per-site basis
• Prevents clickjacking, XSS and other web-based attacks
• Provides privacy by blocking web trackers and beacons
• Lightweight extension with minimal impact on browser performance

uMatrix Features

• Allows granular control over browser requests
• Can block scripts, iframes, CSS, images, etc
• Prevents cross-site tracking
• Forces HTTPS connections
• Open source

Pros & Cons Analysis

NoScript

Pros

• Improves security and privacy while browsing the web
• Lets user control which sites can run plugins/scripts
• Easy to whitelist trusted sites and enable plugins only when needed
• Open source code can be audited for security
• Free to use with no ads or paid tiers

Cons

• Some sites break without JavaScript enabled
• Requires configuring whitelist for full functionality
• Not compatible with all browsers
• Can sometimes block useful functionality

uMatrix

Pros

• Very customizable
• Improves privacy
• Enhances security
• Lightweight and fast

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Can break websites
• Requires more configuration than other blockers

Pricing Comparison

NoScript

• Free
• Open Source

uMatrix

• Open Source