NW.js vs Tauri

Struggling to choose between NW.js and Tauri? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

NW.js is a Development solution with tags like html, css, javascript, nodejs, desktop-apps.

It boasts features such as Lets you build desktop apps using web technologies like HTML, CSS and JavaScript, Integrates Node.js into apps allowing access to system resources, Supports creating apps for Windows, macOS and Linux from a single codebase, Uses Chromium and Node.js as runtime environments, Has a small footprint compared to Electron and pros including Familiar web development skills can be used, Good performance due to lightweight runtimes, Active open source community support, Integration of Node.js modules provides power and flexibility, Cross-platform support from single codebase.

On the other hand, Tauri is a Development product tagged with rust, webview, crossplatform, desktop, framework.

Its standout features include Build cross-platform desktop apps with web technologies, Small binary sizes, Fast performance, Secure - apps run in a sandbox, Access to native OS APIs, Bundling system for assets and dependencies, Hot code reloading, Window management, System tray integration, Global shortcut handling, and it shines with pros like Leverages web dev skills, Fast compile times, Small distributable sizes, Good performance, Active development community.

Feature	NW.js	Tauri
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

NW.js

Description: NW.js (formerly node-webkit) is an open source framework for creating desktop applications with HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. It enables developers to call Node.js modules directly from the DOM and enables desktop applications to integrate web technologies.

Tauri

Description: Tauri is an open source framework for building tiny, blazing fast binaries for all major desktop platforms. It allows developers to use web technologies like HTML, CSS, and JavaScript to build cross-platform desktop applications that are secure, lightweight and fast.

Key Features Comparison

NW.js Features

• Lets you build desktop apps using web technologies like HTML, CSS and JavaScript
• Integrates Node.js into apps allowing access to system resources
• Supports creating apps for Windows, macOS and Linux from a single codebase
• Uses Chromium and Node.js as runtime environments
• Has a small footprint compared to Electron

Tauri Features

• Build cross-platform desktop apps with web technologies
• Small binary sizes
• Fast performance
• Secure - apps run in a sandbox
• Access to native OS APIs
• Bundling system for assets and dependencies
• Hot code reloading
• Window management
• System tray integration
• Global shortcut handling

Pros & Cons Analysis

NW.js

Pros

• Familiar web development skills can be used
• Good performance due to lightweight runtimes
• Active open source community support
• Integration of Node.js modules provides power and flexibility
• Cross-platform support from single codebase

Cons

• Less out-of-box functionality compared to solutions like Electron
• Less active development and momentum than Electron
• More involved to package and distribute apps
• Limited debugging and developer tools support
• Smaller ecosystem of plugins and extensions

Tauri

Pros

• Leverages web dev skills
• Fast compile times
• Small distributable sizes
• Good performance
• Active development community

Cons

• Less mature than Electron
• Limited native API access compared to Electron
• Less third-party libraries and ecosystem

Pricing Comparison

NW.js

• Open Source

Tauri

• Open Source