OpenAM vs Keycloak

Struggling to choose between OpenAM and Keycloak? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

OpenAM is a Security & Privacy solution with tags like sso, authentication, authorization, access-control.

It boasts features such as Single Sign-On (SSO), Federated Identity, Adaptive Risk-based Authentication, Authorization and Entitlement Management, Identity Federation, Session Management, OAuth 2.0 Support and pros including Open source and free, Highly customizable and extensible, Wide protocol and standards support, Robust access management capabilities, Active open source community.

On the other hand, Keycloak is a Security & Privacy product tagged with authentication, authorization, user-management, open-source.

Its standout features include Single sign-on, Identity brokering and social login, User federation, Client adapters, Admin console, and it shines with pros like Open source, Easy integration, Flexible and customizable, Robust access management capabilities.

Feature	OpenAM	Keycloak
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Security & Privacy	Security & Privacy

Product Overview

OpenAM

Description: OpenAM is an open source access management and federation server platform. It enables users to authenticate once and gain access to multiple applications and systems. OpenAM provides single sign-on, authorization, authentication, entitlements and other access management capabilities out of the box.

Keycloak

Description: Keycloak is an open source identity and access management solution. It handles authentication, authorization, and user federation and makes it easy to secure applications and services. Keycloak provides out-of-the-box support for popular protocols like OpenID Connect, OAuth 2.0, and SAML 2.0.

Key Features Comparison

OpenAM Features

• Single Sign-On (SSO)
• Federated Identity
• Adaptive Risk-based Authentication
• Authorization and Entitlement Management
• Identity Federation
• Session Management
• OAuth 2.0 Support

Keycloak Features

• Single sign-on
• Identity brokering and social login
• User federation
• Client adapters
• Admin console

Pros & Cons Analysis

OpenAM

Pros

• Open source and free
• Highly customizable and extensible
• Wide protocol and standards support
• Robust access management capabilities
• Active open source community

Cons

• Complex installation and configuration
• Steep learning curve
• Limited native integrations
• Requires expertise to fully utilize features

Keycloak

Pros

• Open source
• Easy integration
• Flexible and customizable
• Robust access management capabilities

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Complex configuration
• Limited native reporting capabilities

Pricing Comparison

OpenAM

• Open Source

Keycloak

• Open Source