openNAC vs Keycloak

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

openNAC icon
openNAC
Keycloak icon
Keycloak

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between openNAC and Keycloak? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

openNAC is a Network & Admin solution with tags like network-access-control, user-authentication, endpoint-policy-enforcement, network-visibility.

It boasts features such as User authentication, Endpoint policy enforcement, Network visibility, Automated quarantine, Customizable dashboard, Role-based access control, Real-time monitoring, Compliance reporting and pros including Open source and free, Highly customizable, Works with many network devices, Detailed visibility and reporting, Prevents unauthorized access, Integrates with LDAP and RADIUS.

On the other hand, Keycloak is a Security & Privacy product tagged with authentication, authorization, user-management, open-source.

Its standout features include Single sign-on, Identity brokering and social login, User federation, Client adapters, Admin console, and it shines with pros like Open source, Easy integration, Flexible and customizable, Robust access management capabilities.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare openNAC and Keycloak?

When evaluating openNAC versus Keycloak, both solutions serve different needs within the network & admin ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

openNAC and Keycloak have established themselves in the network & admin market. Key areas include network-access-control, user-authentication, endpoint-policy-enforcement.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between openNAC and Keycloak significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include network-access-control, user-authentication, endpoint-policy-enforcement, network-visibility.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include network-access-control, user-authentication and authentication, authorization.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between openNAC and Keycloak. You might also explore network-access-control, user-authentication, endpoint-policy-enforcement for alternative approaches.

Feature openNAC Keycloak
Overall Score N/A N/A
Primary Category Network & Admin Security & Privacy
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

openNAC
openNAC

Description: openNAC is an open-source network access control (NAC) solution for securing and monitoring network access. It offers features like automated user authentication, endpoint policy enforcement, and network visibility.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

Keycloak
Keycloak

Description: Keycloak is an open source identity and access management solution. It handles authentication, authorization, and user federation and makes it easy to secure applications and services. Keycloak provides out-of-the-box support for popular protocols like OpenID Connect, OAuth 2.0, and SAML 2.0.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

openNAC
openNAC Features
  • User authentication
  • Endpoint policy enforcement
  • Network visibility
  • Automated quarantine
  • Customizable dashboard
  • Role-based access control
  • Real-time monitoring
  • Compliance reporting
Keycloak
Keycloak Features
  • Single sign-on
  • Identity brokering and social login
  • User federation
  • Client adapters
  • Admin console

Pros & Cons Analysis

openNAC
openNAC
Pros
  • Open source and free
  • Highly customizable
  • Works with many network devices
  • Detailed visibility and reporting
  • Prevents unauthorized access
  • Integrates with LDAP and RADIUS
Cons
  • Complex setup and configuration
  • Requires dedicated server
  • Limited support options
  • Not suitable for very large networks
Keycloak
Keycloak
Pros
  • Open source
  • Easy integration
  • Flexible and customizable
  • Robust access management capabilities
Cons
  • Steep learning curve
  • Complex configuration
  • Limited native reporting capabilities

Pricing Comparison

openNAC
openNAC
  • Open Source
Keycloak
Keycloak
  • Open Source

Get More Information

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs