OpenScholar vs Adobe Contribute

Struggling to choose between OpenScholar and Adobe Contribute? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

OpenScholar is a Education & Reference solution with tags like opensource, academic, collaboration, publishing, profiles, analytics.

It boasts features such as Create scholar profiles, Share publications, Connect with other researchers, Track analytics and pros including Open source, Free, Customizable, Good analytics.

On the other hand, Adobe Contribute is a Office & Productivity product tagged with web, cms, editing, html.

Its standout features include WYSIWYG editor for editing web pages, Built-in image editing tools, Ability to roll back changes, Integration with other Adobe products, Remote publishing to upload changes, User permissions and approvals, Spell checking, and it shines with pros like Easy for non-technical users, Good for simple web page edits, Allows distributed content creation, Integrates seamlessly with Dreamweaver.

Feature	OpenScholar	Adobe Contribute
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Education & Reference	Office & Productivity

Product Overview

OpenScholar

Description: OpenScholar is an open source alternative to academic collaboration and publishing platforms like Academia.edu. It allows researchers to create scholar profiles, share publications, connect with other researchers, and track analytics on their work.

Adobe Contribute

Description: Adobe Contribute is a web content management system that allows non-technical users to easily update web pages without needing to know HTML. It's useful for simple website edits.

Key Features Comparison

OpenScholar Features

• Create scholar profiles
• Share publications
• Connect with other researchers
• Track analytics

Adobe Contribute Features

• WYSIWYG editor for editing web pages
• Built-in image editing tools
• Ability to roll back changes
• Integration with other Adobe products
• Remote publishing to upload changes
• User permissions and approvals
• Spell checking

Pros & Cons Analysis

OpenScholar

Pros

• Open source
• Free
• Customizable
• Good analytics

Cons

• Limited features compared to paid options
• May require technical expertise to set up and manage

Adobe Contribute

Pros

• Easy for non-technical users
• Good for simple web page edits
• Allows distributed content creation
• Integrates seamlessly with Dreamweaver

Cons

• Limited features compared to full CMSs
• Requires Adobe server for remote publishing
• Lack of templating/layout options
• Not ideal for large or complex sites

Pricing Comparison

OpenScholar

• Open Source

Adobe Contribute

• Subscription-Based