OpenShift vs Kubero

Struggling to choose between OpenShift and Kubero? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

OpenShift is a Development solution with tags like cloud, containers, kubernetes, microservices.

It boasts features such as Container-based architecture, Built-in CI/CD pipelines, Automatic scaling, Multiple language and framework support, Integrated developer tools, Web console for management, CLI access, Role-based access control and pros including Fast and easy deployment, Flexible scaling, Enterprise-grade security, Cost efficient, Open source platform, Integrates with Kubernetes.

On the other hand, Kubero is a Network & Admin product tagged with kubernetes, container, orchestration, opensource.

Its standout features include Graphical user interface for managing Kubernetes clusters, Cluster management - create, edit, upgrade and delete clusters, Resource management - deploy, monitor and manage Kubernetes resources, RBAC management - create users, roles and role bindings, Helm chart management - deploy and manage applications via Helm, Audit logging - view all user and system actions, Multi-cluster management - manage multiple clusters from a single UI, and it shines with pros like Intuitive dashboard simplifies Kubernetes management, No need to use command line for common tasks, Role-based access control for managing user permissions, Support for multiple cloud providers and on-prem clusters, Active community and frequent updates.

Feature	OpenShift	Kubero
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Network & Admin

Product Overview

OpenShift

Description: OpenShift is a cloud platform as a service developed by Red Hat. It allows developers to quickly develop, host, and scale applications in a cloud environment.

Kubero

Description: Kubero is an open-source Kubernetes management platform that provides a user-friendly GUI to manage Kubernetes clusters, resources, users, roles and more. It simplifies Kubernetes with an intuitive dashboard for visibility and control.

Key Features Comparison

OpenShift Features

• Container-based architecture
• Built-in CI/CD pipelines
• Automatic scaling
• Multiple language and framework support
• Integrated developer tools
• Web console for management
• CLI access
• Role-based access control

Kubero Features

• Graphical user interface for managing Kubernetes clusters
• Cluster management - create, edit, upgrade and delete clusters
• Resource management - deploy, monitor and manage Kubernetes resources
• RBAC management - create users, roles and role bindings
• Helm chart management - deploy and manage applications via Helm
• Audit logging - view all user and system actions
• Multi-cluster management - manage multiple clusters from a single UI

Pros & Cons Analysis

OpenShift

Pros

• Fast and easy deployment
• Flexible scaling
• Enterprise-grade security
• Cost efficient
• Open source platform
• Integrates with Kubernetes

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Vendor lock-in
• Limitations in free tier
• Complex pricing model
• Not ideal for non cloud-native apps

Kubero

Pros

• Intuitive dashboard simplifies Kubernetes management
• No need to use command line for common tasks
• Role-based access control for managing user permissions
• Support for multiple cloud providers and on-prem clusters
• Active community and frequent updates

Cons

• Less flexibility than using kubectl directly
• Limited metrics and monitoring capabilities
• No official enterprise support offered
• Less mature than some commercial alternatives

Pricing Comparison

OpenShift

• Free
• Subscription-Based

Kubero

• Open Source