OpenShift vs Last.Backend

Struggling to choose between OpenShift and Last.Backend? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

OpenShift is a Development solution with tags like cloud, containers, kubernetes, microservices.

It boasts features such as Container-based architecture, Built-in CI/CD pipelines, Automatic scaling, Multiple language and framework support, Integrated developer tools, Web console for management, CLI access, Role-based access control and pros including Fast and easy deployment, Flexible scaling, Enterprise-grade security, Cost efficient, Open source platform, Integrates with Kubernetes.

On the other hand, Last.Backend is a Development product tagged with container, kubernetes, microservices, devops.

Its standout features include Automated cluster management, Service discovery and load balancing, Resource scheduling and optimization, Secret management, Built-in monitoring and logging, CLI and UI for managing applications, Support for Kubernetes concepts like Deployments, Services, etc, Horizontal autoscaling of applications, Can deploy to multiple cloud providers and on-prem clusters, and it shines with pros like Open source and free to use, Automates infrastructure management, Makes deploying apps simpler, Good for microservices architectures, Active development community.

Feature	OpenShift	Last.Backend
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

OpenShift

Description: OpenShift is a cloud platform as a service developed by Red Hat. It allows developers to quickly develop, host, and scale applications in a cloud environment.

Last.Backend

Description: Last.Backend is an open-source platform as a service (PaaS) that makes it easier to deploy, scale, and manage containerized applications. It handles cluster management, resource scheduling, service discovery, load balancing, secret management, and more.

Key Features Comparison

OpenShift Features

• Container-based architecture
• Built-in CI/CD pipelines
• Automatic scaling
• Multiple language and framework support
• Integrated developer tools
• Web console for management
• CLI access
• Role-based access control

Last.Backend Features

• Automated cluster management
• Service discovery and load balancing
• Resource scheduling and optimization
• Secret management
• Built-in monitoring and logging
• CLI and UI for managing applications
• Support for Kubernetes concepts like Deployments, Services, etc
• Horizontal autoscaling of applications
• Can deploy to multiple cloud providers and on-prem clusters

Pros & Cons Analysis

OpenShift

Pros

• Fast and easy deployment
• Flexible scaling
• Enterprise-grade security
• Cost efficient
• Open source platform
• Integrates with Kubernetes

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Vendor lock-in
• Limitations in free tier
• Complex pricing model
• Not ideal for non cloud-native apps

Last.Backend

Pros

• Open source and free to use
• Automates infrastructure management
• Makes deploying apps simpler
• Good for microservices architectures
• Active development community

Cons

• Less features than some proprietary PaaS offerings
• Not as mature or widely adopted as alternatives
• Limited to containers, unlike some PaaS that support multiple runtimes
• Steeper learning curve than basic PaaS

Pricing Comparison

OpenShift

• Free
• Subscription-Based

Last.Backend

• Open Source