OpenWISP vs OLSR (Optimized Link State Routing)

Struggling to choose between OpenWISP and OLSR (Optimized Link State Routing)? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

OpenWISP is a Network & Admin solution with tags like open-source, firmware, wisp, wireless, access-point, remote-management.

It boasts features such as Centralized management of wireless networks, Firmware customization and automation, Monitoring of network usage and performance, Remote configuration of access points, User management and authentication, Bandwidth control and traffic shaping, Automatic firmware upgrades, VPN capabilities, Captive portal for guest networks, RADIUS integration for authentication and pros including Open source and free, Active development community, Highly customizable and extensible, Supports a wide range of hardware, Scales to manage large networks, Reduces operating costs for WISPs.

On the other hand, OLSR (Optimized Link State Routing) is a Network & Admin product tagged with routing, protocol, mobile, adhoc, optimized, linkstate.

Its standout features include Proactive (table-driven) routing protocol, Uses optimized link state routing (OLSR) algorithm, Minimizes flooding of control traffic by using only selected nodes to retransmit info, Provides optimal routes in terms of number of hops, Suitable for large and dense mobile ad-hoc networks (MANETs), and it shines with pros like Efficient flooding mechanism reduces control overhead, Rapid discovery of new routes after topology changes, Loop-free routes ensured by use of shortest path algorithm, Scales well to large, dense networks.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

OpenWISP

OpenWISP

OpenWISP is an open source project to create firmware for Wireless Internet Service Providers (WISPs). It allows WISPs to manage a large number of access points remotely through a web interface.

Categories:
open-source firmware wisp wireless access-point remote-management

OpenWISP Features

  1. Centralized management of wireless networks
  2. Firmware customization and automation
  3. Monitoring of network usage and performance
  4. Remote configuration of access points
  5. User management and authentication
  6. Bandwidth control and traffic shaping
  7. Automatic firmware upgrades
  8. VPN capabilities
  9. Captive portal for guest networks
  10. RADIUS integration for authentication

Pricing

  • Open Source

Pros

Open source and free

Active development community

Highly customizable and extensible

Supports a wide range of hardware

Scales to manage large networks

Reduces operating costs for WISPs

Cons

Steeper learning curve than commercial solutions

Limited official support channels

Requires more in-house technical expertise

Not as feature rich as some commercial options

Fragmented documentation


OLSR (Optimized Link State Routing)

OLSR (Optimized Link State Routing)

OLSR is a proactive routing protocol optimized for Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks (MANETs). It uses an optimized algorithm to flood topology information through the network and provide optimal routes. OLSR is suitable for large and dense networks.

Categories:
routing protocol mobile adhoc optimized linkstate

OLSR (Optimized Link State Routing) Features

  1. Proactive (table-driven) routing protocol
  2. Uses optimized link state routing (OLSR) algorithm
  3. Minimizes flooding of control traffic by using only selected nodes to retransmit info
  4. Provides optimal routes in terms of number of hops
  5. Suitable for large and dense mobile ad-hoc networks (MANETs)

Pricing

  • Open Source
  • Free

Pros

Efficient flooding mechanism reduces control overhead

Rapid discovery of new routes after topology changes

Loop-free routes ensured by use of shortest path algorithm

Scales well to large, dense networks

Cons

Constant control overhead regardless of traffic patterns

Higher overhead than on-demand protocols in sparse networks

Relies on periodic HELLO messages - nodes may have stale topology info if messages missed

Security vulnerabilities if not cryptographically protected