Struggling to choose between OrbitDB and CrateDB? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.
OrbitDB is a Development solution with tags like decentralized, peertopeer, ipfs, distributed-web.
It boasts features such as Decentralized database, Built on IPFS, Event log for database changes, Supports CRUD operations, Access control lists, Queryable database API and pros including Decentralization provides censorship resistance, Data is distributed across nodes, Immutable append-only log, Fine-grained access control, Interoperable with other IPFS tools.
On the other hand, CrateDB is a Development product tagged with sql, distributed, scalable, open-source.
Its standout features include Horizontally scalable and fault tolerant, ANSI SQL support, Real-time analytics, Geo-distributed replication, Automatic sharding, Full-text search, In-memory columnar storage engine, NoSQL access via REST API, and it shines with pros like Highly scalable, Fast query performance, Flexible SQL and NoSQL access, Open source with permissive license, Easy to deploy and manage.
To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.
OrbitDB is a decentralized peer-to-peer database that allows developers to build decentralized applications. It works on top of IPFS, providing an API for managing databases on the distributed web.
CrateDB is an open source distributed SQL database that focuses on scalability, performance, and ease of use. It can ingest billions of records per day and run queries across large datasets in real time. CrateDB uses a shared-nothing architecture to horizontally scale reads and writes.