Struggling to choose between OrbitDB and FaunaDB? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.
OrbitDB is a Development solution with tags like decentralized, peertopeer, ipfs, distributed-web.
It boasts features such as Decentralized database, Built on IPFS, Event log for database changes, Supports CRUD operations, Access control lists, Queryable database API and pros including Decentralization provides censorship resistance, Data is distributed across nodes, Immutable append-only log, Fine-grained access control, Interoperable with other IPFS tools.
On the other hand, FaunaDB is a Development product tagged with serverless, cloud, database, graphql, scalable.
Its standout features include Globally distributed database, Serverless, Scalable, Native GraphQL support, Automatic data consistency and replication, and it shines with pros like Easy to scale, Low operational overhead, Built-in GraphQL support, Automatic replication and sharding, Serverless architecture.
To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.
OrbitDB is a decentralized peer-to-peer database that allows developers to build decentralized applications. It works on top of IPFS, providing an API for managing databases on the distributed web.
FaunaDB is a globally distributed, serverless cloud database that enables developers to build modern applications without operational databases. It is highly scalable, provides native GraphQL support, and handles data consistency and replication automatically.