OrbitDB vs Hazelcast

Struggling to choose between OrbitDB and Hazelcast? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

OrbitDB is a Development solution with tags like decentralized, peertopeer, ipfs, distributed-web.

It boasts features such as Decentralized database, Built on IPFS, Event log for database changes, Supports CRUD operations, Access control lists, Queryable database API and pros including Decentralization provides censorship resistance, Data is distributed across nodes, Immutable append-only log, Fine-grained access control, Interoperable with other IPFS tools.

On the other hand, Hazelcast is a Development product tagged with caching, processing-streams, clustering.

Its standout features include Distributed in-memory data store, Low latency data access, Automatic sharding and rebalancing, ACID transactions, Querying and aggregation, Event journaling, Multi-datacenter replication, Web session clustering, Continuous query, Machine learning, and it shines with pros like Fast performance, Easy scalability, High availability, Flexible deployment options, Open source, Rich ecosystem.

Feature	OrbitDB	Hazelcast
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

OrbitDB

Description: OrbitDB is a decentralized peer-to-peer database that allows developers to build decentralized applications. It works on top of IPFS, providing an API for managing databases on the distributed web.

Hazelcast

Description: Hazelcast is an open source in-memory data grid that enables distribution of data and computation across servers for scalability, speed, and resilience. It is commonly used for caching, processing streams, and clustering.

Key Features Comparison

OrbitDB Features

• Decentralized database
• Built on IPFS
• Event log for database changes
• Supports CRUD operations
• Access control lists
• Queryable database API

Hazelcast Features

• Distributed in-memory data store
• Low latency data access
• Automatic sharding and rebalancing
• ACID transactions
• Querying and aggregation
• Event journaling
• Multi-datacenter replication
• Web session clustering
• Continuous query
• Machine learning

Pros & Cons Analysis

OrbitDB

Pros

• Decentralization provides censorship resistance
• Data is distributed across nodes
• Immutable append-only log
• Fine-grained access control
• Interoperable with other IPFS tools

Cons

• Still in early development
• Limited query capabilities
• Performance limitations of IPFS
• No built-in indexing or relationships

Hazelcast

Pros

• Fast performance
• Easy scalability
• High availability
• Flexible deployment options
• Open source
• Rich ecosystem

Cons

• Complex configuration
• Steep learning curve
• No visual interface

Pricing Comparison

OrbitDB

• Open Source

Hazelcast

• Open Source
• Enterprise Edition (Subscription)