OrbitDB vs lowdb

Struggling to choose between OrbitDB and lowdb? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

OrbitDB is a Development solution with tags like decentralized, peertopeer, ipfs, distributed-web.

It boasts features such as Decentralized database, Built on IPFS, Event log for database changes, Supports CRUD operations, Access control lists, Queryable database API and pros including Decentralization provides censorship resistance, Data is distributed across nodes, Immutable append-only log, Fine-grained access control, Interoperable with other IPFS tools.

On the other hand, lowdb is a Development product tagged with json, database, nodejs, local-storage.

Its standout features include Lightweight JSON database for Node.js and browser, Uses lodash syntax for simple CRUD operations, Stores data locally as JSON file, No dependencies required, Supports synchronous and asynchronous modes, Easy to use with small API surface, and it shines with pros like Simple and easy to use, Fast performance for simple datasets, Lightweight with no dependencies, Works across Node.js and browser, Familiar lodash/underscore syntax, Active development and maintenance.

Feature	OrbitDB	lowdb
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

OrbitDB

Description: OrbitDB is a decentralized peer-to-peer database that allows developers to build decentralized applications. It works on top of IPFS, providing an API for managing databases on the distributed web.

lowdb

Description: lowdb is a small local JSON database for Node.js, Electron and the browser that uses lodash syntax. It supports data persistence, provides simple CRUD operations and requires no dependencies.

Key Features Comparison

OrbitDB Features

• Decentralized database
• Built on IPFS
• Event log for database changes
• Supports CRUD operations
• Access control lists
• Queryable database API

lowdb Features

• Lightweight JSON database for Node.js and browser
• Uses lodash syntax for simple CRUD operations
• Stores data locally as JSON file
• No dependencies required
• Supports synchronous and asynchronous modes
• Easy to use with small API surface

Pros & Cons Analysis

OrbitDB

Pros

• Decentralization provides censorship resistance
• Data is distributed across nodes
• Immutable append-only log
• Fine-grained access control
• Interoperable with other IPFS tools

Cons

• Still in early development
• Limited query capabilities
• Performance limitations of IPFS
• No built-in indexing or relationships

lowdb

Pros

• Simple and easy to use
• Fast performance for simple datasets
• Lightweight with no dependencies
• Works across Node.js and browser
• Familiar lodash/underscore syntax
• Active development and maintenance

Cons

• Not suitable for large or complex datasets
• Limited query capabilities
• No relationships between data
• Not optimized for high concurrency
• No built-in indexing

Pricing Comparison

OrbitDB

• Open Source

lowdb

• Open Source