Orthanc vs ConQuest DICOM server

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

Orthanc icon
Orthanc
ConQuest DICOM server icon
ConQuest DICOM server

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between Orthanc and ConQuest DICOM server? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Orthanc is a Medical Imaging solution with tags like dicom, pacs, medical-imaging, healthcare.

It boasts features such as DICOM storage, DICOM query/retrieve, DICOM modalities worklist, DICOM printing, DICOM transcoding, DICOM routing, REST API, Plugins and pros including Open source, Lightweight, Cross-platform, Secure, Efficient, Customizable via plugins.

On the other hand, ConQuest DICOM server is a Medical product tagged with dicom, medical-imaging, pacs.

Its standout features include Open-source DICOM storage server, Enables medical facilities to store, manage, and distribute medical images and related data, Supports standard DICOM networking and security protocols, and it shines with pros like Open-source and free to use, Supports standard DICOM protocols, Enables secure storage and distribution of medical images.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare Orthanc and ConQuest DICOM server?

When evaluating Orthanc versus ConQuest DICOM server, both solutions serve different needs within the medical imaging ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

Orthanc and ConQuest DICOM server have established themselves in the medical imaging market. Key areas include dicom, pacs, medical-imaging.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between Orthanc and ConQuest DICOM server significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include dicom, pacs, medical-imaging, healthcare.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include dicom, pacs and dicom, medical-imaging.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between Orthanc and ConQuest DICOM server. You might also explore dicom, pacs, medical-imaging for alternative approaches.

Feature Orthanc ConQuest DICOM server
Overall Score N/A N/A
Primary Category Medical Imaging Medical
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

Orthanc
Orthanc

Description: Orthanc is an open-source, lightweight DICOM server designed for healthcare and medical imaging applications. It allows DICOM files to be stored, retrieved, processed, and exchanged securely and efficiently for use in PACS systems.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

ConQuest DICOM server
ConQuest DICOM server

Description: ConQuest DICOM server is an open-source DICOM storage server that enables medical facilities to store, manage, and distribute medical images and related data. It supports standard DICOM networking and security protocols.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

Orthanc
Orthanc Features
  • DICOM storage
  • DICOM query/retrieve
  • DICOM modalities worklist
  • DICOM printing
  • DICOM transcoding
  • DICOM routing
  • REST API
  • Plugins
ConQuest DICOM server
ConQuest DICOM server Features
  • Open-source DICOM storage server
  • Enables medical facilities to store, manage, and distribute medical images and related data
  • Supports standard DICOM networking and security protocols

Pros & Cons Analysis

Orthanc
Orthanc
Pros
  • Open source
  • Lightweight
  • Cross-platform
  • Secure
  • Efficient
  • Customizable via plugins
Cons
  • Limited native image processing capabilities
  • Steep learning curve
  • Limited support options
ConQuest DICOM server
ConQuest DICOM server
Pros
  • Open-source and free to use
  • Supports standard DICOM protocols
  • Enables secure storage and distribution of medical images
Cons
  • May require technical expertise to set up and configure
  • Limited support and documentation compared to commercial DICOM servers

Pricing Comparison

Orthanc
Orthanc
  • Open Source
ConQuest DICOM server
ConQuest DICOM server
  • Open Source

Get More Information

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs