OWASP Dependency-Track vs FOSSA

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

OWASP Dependency-Track icon
OWASP Dependency-Track
FOSSA icon
FOSSA

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between OWASP Dependency-Track and FOSSA? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

OWASP Dependency-Track is a Security & Privacy solution with tags like opensource, software-composition-analysis, supply-chain, dependency-management, license-compliance.

It boasts features such as Dependency analysis, Vulnerability analysis, License analysis, Bill of materials (BOM) management, Software component intelligence, Web UI and REST API, Integrations with build tools and repositories and pros including Free and open source, Helps identify and reduce risk from open source usage, Provides visibility into software supply chain, Customizable rules and policies, Can integrate with CI/CD pipelines.

On the other hand, FOSSA is a Development product tagged with open-source, license-scanning, dependency-analysis, license-compliance.

Its standout features include Automatic scanning of codebases to detect open source dependencies, Identification of licenses for dependencies, License compliance checks and guidance, Customizable policy management, Integration with CI/CD pipelines, Web UI and CLI for managing scans and compliance, REST API for automation and integration, Support for many languages and package managers, and it shines with pros like Automates open source compliance processes, Saves time compared to manual reviews, Provides clarity on licensing obligations, Helps ensure legal compliance and reduce risk, Integrates into developer workflows, Scales analysis across large codebases, Free for open source projects.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare OWASP Dependency-Track and FOSSA?

When evaluating OWASP Dependency-Track versus FOSSA, both solutions serve different needs within the security & privacy ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

OWASP Dependency-Track and FOSSA have established themselves in the security & privacy market. Key areas include opensource, software-composition-analysis, supply-chain.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between OWASP Dependency-Track and FOSSA significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include opensource, software-composition-analysis, supply-chain, dependency-management.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include opensource, software-composition-analysis and open-source, license-scanning.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between OWASP Dependency-Track and FOSSA. You might also explore opensource, software-composition-analysis, supply-chain for alternative approaches.

Feature OWASP Dependency-Track FOSSA
Overall Score N/A N/A
Primary Category Security & Privacy Development
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

OWASP Dependency-Track
OWASP Dependency-Track

Description: OWASP Dependency-Track is an open source software composition analysis tool that allows organizations to identify and reduce risk from the use of third-party and open source components. It scans project dependencies and generates reports on vulnerabilities, licenses, and other metadata to support policy enforcement and provide visibility into software supply chain risks.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

FOSSA
FOSSA

Description: FOSSA is an open source license compliance management platform that helps developers and enterprises understand and comply with open source licensing requirements. It scans codebases to detect dependencies and licenses, generates reports, and provides guidance on compliance issues.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

OWASP Dependency-Track
OWASP Dependency-Track Features
  • Dependency analysis
  • Vulnerability analysis
  • License analysis
  • Bill of materials (BOM) management
  • Software component intelligence
  • Web UI and REST API
  • Integrations with build tools and repositories
FOSSA
FOSSA Features
  • Automatic scanning of codebases to detect open source dependencies
  • Identification of licenses for dependencies
  • License compliance checks and guidance
  • Customizable policy management
  • Integration with CI/CD pipelines
  • Web UI and CLI for managing scans and compliance
  • REST API for automation and integration
  • Support for many languages and package managers

Pros & Cons Analysis

OWASP Dependency-Track
OWASP Dependency-Track
Pros
  • Free and open source
  • Helps identify and reduce risk from open source usage
  • Provides visibility into software supply chain
  • Customizable rules and policies
  • Can integrate with CI/CD pipelines
Cons
  • Requires some effort to setup and configure
  • Limited scalability compared to commercial SCA tools
  • Lacks some advanced features like auto-remediation
FOSSA
FOSSA
Pros
  • Automates open source compliance processes
  • Saves time compared to manual reviews
  • Provides clarity on licensing obligations
  • Helps ensure legal compliance and reduce risk
  • Integrates into developer workflows
  • Scales analysis across large codebases
  • Free for open source projects
Cons
  • May miss some obscure dependencies or licenses
  • Limited customization in free tier
  • Can take time to setup and integrate initially
  • May lack features of commercial competitors
  • Free version lacks support services

Pricing Comparison

OWASP Dependency-Track
OWASP Dependency-Track
  • Open Source
FOSSA
FOSSA
  • Free
  • Freemium
  • Open Source

Get More Information

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs