Oxipng vs Squoosh

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

Oxipng icon
Oxipng
Squoosh icon
Squoosh

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between Oxipng and Squoosh? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Oxipng is a Photos & Graphics solution with tags like png, compression, optimization, metadata-removal.

It boasts features such as Lossless compression of PNG files, Removes unnecessary metadata, Optimizes compression settings, Multithreaded for faster optimization, Command line interface and pros including Greatly reduces PNG file sizes, Lossless optimization preserves image quality, Easy to automate and integrate into workflows, Actively maintained and updated.

On the other hand, Squoosh is a Photos & Graphics product tagged with image-compression, browserbased, open-source, jpg, png, gif.

Its standout features include Compress JPG, PNG, GIF, WebP and AVIF images, Supports advanced compression algorithms like MozJPEG, Oxipng, WebP and AVIF, Reduces image sizes without visible quality loss, Works directly in the browser, Open source and free to use, and it shines with pros like Dramatically reduces image sizes, Fast and easy to use, Works right in the browser, Completely free and open source, Supports next-gen image formats like WebP and AVIF.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare Oxipng and Squoosh?

When evaluating Oxipng versus Squoosh, both solutions serve different needs within the photos & graphics ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

Oxipng and Squoosh have established themselves in the photos & graphics market. Key areas include png, compression, optimization.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between Oxipng and Squoosh significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include png, compression, optimization, metadata-removal.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include png, compression and image-compression, browserbased.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between Oxipng and Squoosh. You might also explore png, compression, optimization for alternative approaches.

Feature Oxipng Squoosh
Overall Score N/A N/A
Primary Category Photos & Graphics Photos & Graphics
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

Oxipng
Oxipng

Description: Oxipng is an image optimization tool for PNG files. It can optimize PNGs losslessly to reduce file size by removing unnecessary metadata and optimizing compression settings.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

Squoosh
Squoosh

Description: Squoosh is a free, open source image compression web app that allows users to efficiently compress images directly in the browser. It supports various image formats like JPG, PNG, GIF, and more, and uses advanced algorithms to reduce file sizes without visible image quality loss.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

Oxipng
Oxipng Features
  • Lossless compression of PNG files
  • Removes unnecessary metadata
  • Optimizes compression settings
  • Multithreaded for faster optimization
  • Command line interface
Squoosh
Squoosh Features
  • Compress JPG, PNG, GIF, WebP and AVIF images
  • Supports advanced compression algorithms like MozJPEG, Oxipng, WebP and AVIF
  • Reduces image sizes without visible quality loss
  • Works directly in the browser
  • Open source and free to use

Pros & Cons Analysis

Oxipng
Oxipng
Pros
  • Greatly reduces PNG file sizes
  • Lossless optimization preserves image quality
  • Easy to automate and integrate into workflows
  • Actively maintained and updated
Cons
  • Command line only, no GUI
  • Slower than lossy PNG optimization
  • Limited to PNG files only
Squoosh
Squoosh
Pros
  • Dramatically reduces image sizes
  • Fast and easy to use
  • Works right in the browser
  • Completely free and open source
  • Supports next-gen image formats like WebP and AVIF
Cons
  • Limited to image compression only
  • Requires modern browser that supports Web Assembly
  • Fewer options compared to desktop image editors

Pricing Comparison

Oxipng
Oxipng
  • Free
  • Open Source
Squoosh
Squoosh
  • Open Source
  • Free

Get More Information

Oxipng
Oxipng
Oxipng
Learn More About Oxipng
Squoosh
Squoosh
Squoosh
Learn More About Squoosh

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs

Browse More Software
Back to Homepage
Company
Explore
Resources

We compare. You choose.

© 2025 Sugggest.com. All Rights Reserved.
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Cookie Policy Legal