Paessler PRTG Network Monitor vs Netactview

Struggling to choose between Paessler PRTG Network Monitor and Netactview? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Paessler PRTG Network Monitor is a Network & Admin solution with tags like network, monitoring, infrastructure, devices, servers, switches, routers, websites, applications, alerting.

It boasts features such as Auto-discovery of network devices and servers, Monitoring of network bandwidth usage, traffic, availability and uptime, Monitoring of server resources and performance metrics, Monitoring of website and web application availability, Advanced alerting and notification features, Customizable dashboards and reporting, Sensor-based monitoring architecture, Support for SNMP, WMI, NetFlow and other protocols, Agentless and agent-based monitoring options and pros including Comprehensive monitoring capabilities, Easy to set up and configure, Intuitive web interface, Powerful alerting and notification features, Customizable dashboards and reports, Scales to monitor large environments, Wide range of supported protocols and sensors.

On the other hand, Netactview is a Network & Admin product tagged with network, monitoring, bandwidth, linux.

Its standout features include Real-time network monitoring, Bandwidth monitoring, Response time tracking, Packet loss monitoring, Customizable dashboard, Alerting and notifications, Supports SNMP, Plugin architecture, and it shines with pros like Open source and free, Lightweight and low resource usage, Easy to install and configure, Good for basic network monitoring needs, Customizable dashboards, Cross-platform.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Paessler PRTG Network Monitor

Paessler PRTG Network Monitor

Paessler PRTG Network Monitor is a powerful and comprehensive network monitoring solution for monitoring IT infrastructure and network devices. It can monitor servers, switches, routers, websites, applications and more with advanced alerting features.

Categories:
network monitoring infrastructure devices servers switches routers websites applications alerting

Paessler PRTG Network Monitor Features

  1. Auto-discovery of network devices and servers
  2. Monitoring of network bandwidth usage, traffic, availability and uptime
  3. Monitoring of server resources and performance metrics
  4. Monitoring of website and web application availability
  5. Advanced alerting and notification features
  6. Customizable dashboards and reporting
  7. Sensor-based monitoring architecture
  8. Support for SNMP, WMI, NetFlow and other protocols
  9. Agentless and agent-based monitoring options

Pricing

  • Free version for up to 100 sensors
  • Commercial version with tiered subscription pricing

Pros

Comprehensive monitoring capabilities

Easy to set up and configure

Intuitive web interface

Powerful alerting and notification features

Customizable dashboards and reports

Scales to monitor large environments

Wide range of supported protocols and sensors

Cons

Can be complex for beginners

Requires resources to run monitoring server

Limited support for monitoring cloud infrastructure


Netactview

Netactview

Netactview is an open-source network monitoring tool for Linux. It provides real-time graphs and statistics for tracking network usage, bandwidth monitoring, response times, packet loss, and more.

Categories:
network monitoring bandwidth linux

Netactview Features

  1. Real-time network monitoring
  2. Bandwidth monitoring
  3. Response time tracking
  4. Packet loss monitoring
  5. Customizable dashboard
  6. Alerting and notifications
  7. Supports SNMP
  8. Plugin architecture

Pricing

  • Open Source

Pros

Open source and free

Lightweight and low resource usage

Easy to install and configure

Good for basic network monitoring needs

Customizable dashboards

Cross-platform

Cons

Limited built-in reports

Less flexible than commercial alternatives

Steep learning curve

Only supports Linux

Basic UI lacking polish