pekwm vs i3

Struggling to choose between pekwm and i3? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

pekwm is a Os & Utilities solution with tags like lightweight, customizable, stacking, minimal.

It boasts features such as Lightweight and fast, Stacking window manager, Highly configurable, Supports virtual desktops, Themeable with multiple themes available, Keyboard driven, Supports compositing for transparency effects, Tabbed windows and pros including Very lightweight and fast, Highly customizable, Many configuration options, Low resource usage, Good performance, Active development and community support.

On the other hand, i3 is a Os & Utilities product tagged with tiling, keyboarddriven, lightweight, configurable, unixlike.

Its standout features include Tiling window manager, Tree-like window organization, Customizable keyboard shortcuts, Simple, lightweight and fast, Support for multiple workspaces, and it shines with pros like Very efficient use of screen space, Highly customizable, Light on system resources, Keyboard-driven workflow, Stable and mature codebase.

Feature	pekwm	i3
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Os & Utilities	Os & Utilities

Product Overview

pekwm

Description: pekwm is a fast, lightweight, and customizable stacking window manager for X. It is very configurable but still easy to use, making it a popular choice for minimal Linux desktop environments.

i3

Description: i3 is a tiling window manager for Linux and other Unix-like operating systems. It is designed to be simple, fast, and lightweight while still being customizable and flexible. i3 organizes application windows in a tree-like structure and allows efficient window switching and placement.

Key Features Comparison

pekwm Features

• Lightweight and fast
• Stacking window manager
• Highly configurable
• Supports virtual desktops
• Themeable with multiple themes available
• Keyboard driven
• Supports compositing for transparency effects
• Tabbed windows

i3 Features

• Tiling window manager
• Tree-like window organization
• Customizable keyboard shortcuts
• Simple, lightweight and fast
• Support for multiple workspaces

Pros & Cons Analysis

pekwm

Pros

• Very lightweight and fast
• Highly customizable
• Many configuration options
• Low resource usage
• Good performance
• Active development and community support

Cons

• Manual configuration required
• Less features than full desktop environments
• Less intuitive than beginner-friendly WMs
• No included panel or tray

i3

Pros

• Very efficient use of screen space
• Highly customizable
• Light on system resources
• Keyboard-driven workflow
• Stable and mature codebase

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Manual configuration required
• Not designed for touchscreens
• Less flexibility in window arrangements
• Less integrated with desktop environment

Pricing Comparison

pekwm

• Open Source

i3

• Open Source
• Free