Pelican vs Lego Static Site Generator

Struggling to choose between Pelican and Lego Static Site Generator? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Pelican is a Development solution with tags like python, static, site-generator, blogging.

It boasts features such as Static site generator, Supports Markdown and reStructuredText content, Themes and plugins allow customization, Built-in support for code syntax highlighting, Automatic content pagination, Supports tags, categories and archives, Easy to deploy - generates static HTML files, Good documentation and active community and pros including Flexible and extensible, Good performance for static sites, Lots of themes and plugins available, Easy to get started for beginners, Integrates well with Python ecosystem.

On the other hand, Lego Static Site Generator is a Development product tagged with opensource, go, fast, simple, markdown.

Its standout features include Fast build times, Simple and clean API, Markdown support out of the box, Theming support, Built-in development server, Flexible content organization, Plugin ecosystem, and it shines with pros like Very fast compared to other static site generators, Easy to use API for creating sites, Supports Markdown content without configuration, Can create custom themes, Built-in dev server for testing, Flexible content structure, Extendable with plugins.

Feature	Pelican	Lego Static Site Generator
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

Pelican

Description: Pelican is a popular open source static site generator written in Python. It is designed for flexibility and extensibility, allowing developers to customize it for different projects. Pelican takes Markdown or reST content and generates complete static HTML websites that can be easily deployed.

Lego Static Site Generator

Description: Lego is an open-source static site generator written in Go that builds extremely fast and provides a simple, yet powerful API for creating static sites. It supports Markdown content out of the box.

Key Features Comparison

Pelican Features

• Static site generator
• Supports Markdown and reStructuredText content
• Themes and plugins allow customization
• Built-in support for code syntax highlighting
• Automatic content pagination
• Supports tags, categories and archives
• Easy to deploy - generates static HTML files
• Good documentation and active community

Lego Static Site Generator Features

• Fast build times
• Simple and clean API
• Markdown support out of the box
• Theming support
• Built-in development server
• Flexible content organization
• Plugin ecosystem

Pros & Cons Analysis

Pelican

Pros

• Flexible and extensible
• Good performance for static sites
• Lots of themes and plugins available
• Easy to get started for beginners
• Integrates well with Python ecosystem

Cons

• Not ideal for very large or complex sites
• Steeper learning curve than some website builders
• Limited built-in CMS capabilities
• Requires command line usage for many tasks

Lego Static Site Generator

Pros

• Very fast compared to other static site generators
• Easy to use API for creating sites
• Supports Markdown content without configuration
• Can create custom themes
• Built-in dev server for testing
• Flexible content structure
• Extendable with plugins

Cons

• Less features than some competitors
• Smaller community than options like Hugo
• Less template language options
• Less prebuilt themes available
• Still relatively new project

Pricing Comparison

Pelican

• Open Source

Lego Static Site Generator

• Open Source