Percy by BrowserStack vs AppVeyor

Struggling to choose between Percy by BrowserStack and AppVeyor? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Percy by BrowserStack is a Development solution with tags like visual-testing, regression-testing, ui-testing, github-integration.

It boasts features such as Automated visual testing, Integrations with GitHub, Bitbucket, Jira, and other development tools, Visual diffs and snapshots for UI changes, Collaborative review and approval workflows, Cross-browser and responsive testing, Customizable test suites and baselines, Detailed reporting and analytics and pros including Streamlines the visual review process, Catches UI issues early in the development cycle, Improves collaboration and communication among team members, Provides comprehensive visual testing coverage, Integrates with existing development workflows.

On the other hand, AppVeyor is a Development product tagged with cicd, testing, net, windows.

Its standout features include Continuous integration for .NET applications, Build pipeline configuration via YAML, Artifact management and storage, Test automation and parallel testing, Role-based access control, Real-time build status and notifications, Integrations with GitHub, Bitbucket, etc., and it shines with pros like Easy to set up and configure, Free for open source projects, Fast and reliable build infrastructure, Detailed build logs and history, Supports multiple platforms like .NET Framework, .NET Core, etc., Integrates seamlessly with popular source control systems.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Percy by BrowserStack

Percy by BrowserStack

Percy is a visual testing and review platform that integrates with GitHub and other development tools to let teams automate visual reviews and catch UI issues before releasing code to production.

Categories:
visual-testing regression-testing ui-testing github-integration

Percy by BrowserStack Features

  1. Automated visual testing
  2. Integrations with GitHub, Bitbucket, Jira, and other development tools
  3. Visual diffs and snapshots for UI changes
  4. Collaborative review and approval workflows
  5. Cross-browser and responsive testing
  6. Customizable test suites and baselines
  7. Detailed reporting and analytics

Pricing

  • Subscription-Based

Pros

Streamlines the visual review process

Catches UI issues early in the development cycle

Improves collaboration and communication among team members

Provides comprehensive visual testing coverage

Integrates with existing development workflows

Cons

Requires a learning curve for setup and configuration

Pricing may be higher for larger teams or enterprises

Potential compatibility issues with certain development tools


AppVeyor

AppVeyor

AppVeyor is a hosted continuous integration and deployment service for Windows and .NET applications. It builds, runs tests and deploys applications automatically when developers push code to their source control system.

Categories:
cicd testing net windows

AppVeyor Features

  1. Continuous integration for .NET applications
  2. Build pipeline configuration via YAML
  3. Artifact management and storage
  4. Test automation and parallel testing
  5. Role-based access control
  6. Real-time build status and notifications
  7. Integrations with GitHub, Bitbucket, etc.

Pricing

  • Free
  • Freemium
  • Subscription-Based

Pros

Easy to set up and configure

Free for open source projects

Fast and reliable build infrastructure

Detailed build logs and history

Supports multiple platforms like .NET Framework, .NET Core, etc.

Integrates seamlessly with popular source control systems

Cons

Limited free plan with 100 build minutes per month

No native support for non-.NET technologies

Can be complex for larger, enterprise-level projects

Limited customization compared to self-hosted options