Percy by BrowserStack vs Laminar

Struggling to choose between Percy by BrowserStack and Laminar? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Percy by BrowserStack is a Development solution with tags like visual-testing, regression-testing, ui-testing, github-integration.

It boasts features such as Automated visual testing, Integrations with GitHub, Bitbucket, Jira, and other development tools, Visual diffs and snapshots for UI changes, Collaborative review and approval workflows, Cross-browser and responsive testing, Customizable test suites and baselines, Detailed reporting and analytics and pros including Streamlines the visual review process, Catches UI issues early in the development cycle, Improves collaboration and communication among team members, Provides comprehensive visual testing coverage, Integrates with existing development workflows.

On the other hand, Laminar is a Development product tagged with reactive, web-apps, functional-programming.

Its standout features include Reactive programming model, Declarative UI, Component-based architecture, Virtual DOM diffing, Server-side rendering, TypeScript support, and it shines with pros like Simple and lightweight, Good performance, Easy to learn, Great documentation, Active community.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Percy by BrowserStack

Percy by BrowserStack

Percy is a visual testing and review platform that integrates with GitHub and other development tools to let teams automate visual reviews and catch UI issues before releasing code to production.

Categories:
visual-testing regression-testing ui-testing github-integration

Percy by BrowserStack Features

  1. Automated visual testing
  2. Integrations with GitHub, Bitbucket, Jira, and other development tools
  3. Visual diffs and snapshots for UI changes
  4. Collaborative review and approval workflows
  5. Cross-browser and responsive testing
  6. Customizable test suites and baselines
  7. Detailed reporting and analytics

Pricing

  • Subscription-Based

Pros

Streamlines the visual review process

Catches UI issues early in the development cycle

Improves collaboration and communication among team members

Provides comprehensive visual testing coverage

Integrates with existing development workflows

Cons

Requires a learning curve for setup and configuration

Pricing may be higher for larger teams or enterprises

Potential compatibility issues with certain development tools


Laminar

Laminar

Laminar is an open-source tool for developing reactive web apps. It offers a functional and reactive programming model to build user interfaces in a declarative way, similar to React but with a focus on simplicity and developer ergonomics.

Categories:
reactive web-apps functional-programming

Laminar Features

  1. Reactive programming model
  2. Declarative UI
  3. Component-based architecture
  4. Virtual DOM diffing
  5. Server-side rendering
  6. TypeScript support

Pricing

  • Open Source

Pros

Simple and lightweight

Good performance

Easy to learn

Great documentation

Active community

Cons

Less ecosystem than React

Less flexible than React

Not suitable for complex apps

Limited component libraries