Pexels vs Wikimedia Commons

Struggling to choose between Pexels and Wikimedia Commons? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Pexels is a Photos & Graphics solution with tags like photos, videos, free, stock, library, sharing, platform.

It boasts features such as Large library of free stock photos and videos, No attribution required, Advanced search filters (keywords, color, orientation, etc.), Easy downloading of media, Mobile app available, Integration with other apps/services and pros including Completely free, No copyright issues, High-quality content, Constantly growing media library, Intuitive interface and search, Commercial use allowed.

On the other hand, Wikimedia Commons is a Online Services product tagged with images, videos, audio, media-repository, file-sharing, creative-commons.

Its standout features include Large collection of freely-usable media files, Centralized location to store and share files, Support for images, videos, sounds, and other file types, Used in educational and creative projects, and it shines with pros like Completely free to use, Massive selection of media, Active community of contributors, Flexible licensing options.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Pexels

Pexels

Pexels is a free stock photo and video sharing platform. It offers a large library of high-quality media that can be used for personal and commercial projects without attribution. The interface makes it easy to search for and download photos and videos based on keywords, color, orientation, etc.

Categories:
photos videos free stock library sharing platform

Pexels Features

  1. Large library of free stock photos and videos
  2. No attribution required
  3. Advanced search filters (keywords, color, orientation, etc.)
  4. Easy downloading of media
  5. Mobile app available
  6. Integration with other apps/services

Pricing

  • Free

Pros

Completely free

No copyright issues

High-quality content

Constantly growing media library

Intuitive interface and search

Commercial use allowed

Cons

Limited selection compared to paid services

No ability to request custom photos

Somewhat generic selection of images

Lower resolution files than paid services

No ability to save collections or lightboxes


Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons is a media repository containing over 60 million freely usable media files. It provides a centralized location to store and share images, videos, sounds, and other files for use in educational and creative projects.

Categories:
images videos audio media-repository file-sharing creative-commons

Wikimedia Commons Features

  1. Large collection of freely-usable media files
  2. Centralized location to store and share files
  3. Support for images, videos, sounds, and other file types
  4. Used in educational and creative projects

Pricing

  • Open Source

Pros

Completely free to use

Massive selection of media

Active community of contributors

Flexible licensing options

Cons

No quality control over uploads

Difficult to find specific media

Some files have unclear licensing terms

Uploads require a Wikimedia account