Photobucket vs mediaHUMP

Struggling to choose between Photobucket and mediaHUMP? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Photobucket is a Photos & Graphics solution with tags like photo, image, video, sharing, hosting, community.

It boasts features such as Photo hosting, Video hosting, Image sharing, Social features, Mobile apps, Slideshows, Print services and pros including Free basic plan, Easy to use interface, Good organization features, Social sharing options, Mobile app available.

On the other hand, mediaHUMP is a Media & Entertainment product tagged with opensource, selfhosted, media-library, video, audio, photo, streaming.

Its standout features include Organizes personal media libraries, Provides web-based interface to browse, search and play media, Supports video, audio and photo formats, Automatic metadata fetching & tagging, User access management and permissions, Transcoding media files on the fly, Streaming media to various devices, Pluggable architecture to add new features, Self-hosted, runs on your own server, and it shines with pros like Open source and free, Customizable and extensible, Good community support, Actively developed and maintained.

Feature	Photobucket	mediaHUMP
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Photos & Graphics	Media & Entertainment

Product Overview

Photobucket

Description: Photobucket is an image and video hosting platform and online community for sharing personal photos, videos, GIFs, and images. It allows users to upload media, create albums, share links, and embed images.

mediaHUMP

Description: mediaHUMP is an open-source, self-hosted media server for managing and streaming personal media libraries. It supports organizing, previewing, and streaming video, audio, and photo files to a variety of devices.

Key Features Comparison

Photobucket Features

• Photo hosting
• Video hosting
• Image sharing
• Social features
• Mobile apps
• Slideshows
• Print services

mediaHUMP Features

• Organizes personal media libraries
• Provides web-based interface to browse, search and play media
• Supports video, audio and photo formats
• Automatic metadata fetching & tagging
• User access management and permissions
• Transcoding media files on the fly
• Streaming media to various devices
• Pluggable architecture to add new features
• Self-hosted, runs on your own server

Pros & Cons Analysis

Photobucket

Pros

• Free basic plan
• Easy to use interface
• Good organization features
• Social sharing options
• Mobile app available

Cons

• Storage limits on free plan
• Paid plans can be expensive
• Advertisements on free plan
• Limited customization options
• No RAW photo support

mediaHUMP

Pros

• Open source and free
• Customizable and extensible
• Good community support
• Actively developed and maintained

Cons

• Can be resource intensive
• Setup and configuration can be complex
• No mobile apps
• Lacks some features of commercial alternatives

Pricing Comparison

Photobucket

• Freemium
• Subscription-Based

mediaHUMP

• Open Source