phpIPAM vs NIPAP

Struggling to choose between phpIPAM and NIPAP? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

phpIPAM is a Network & Admin solution with tags like ipam, ipv4, ipv6, subnet, vlan, open-source.

It boasts features such as IP address management, Subnet management, VLAN management, DHCP server management, DNS server management, User and group management, REST API and pros including Open source, Easy to use web interface, Scales to mid-size networks, Integrates with LDAP/AD, REST API for automation.

On the other hand, NIPAP is a Network & Admin product tagged with ipam, ipv4, ipv6, address-management, automation.

Its standout features include IP address management, Subnet management, VLAN management, Prefix delegation, IP address reservations, Automated workflows, REST API, Command line interface, and it shines with pros like Open source, Flexible and customizable, Scalable for large networks, Automates tedious IPAM tasks, Integrates with existing systems, Good documentation.

Feature	phpIPAM	NIPAP
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Network & Admin	Network & Admin

Product Overview

phpIPAM

Description: phpIPAM is an open-source IP address management application. It allows administrators to manage IPv4 and IPv6 addresses, subnets, VLANs, and other network objects through a web interface. Useful for mid-size networks.

NIPAP

Description: NIPAP is an open source IP address management tool used for managing large pools of IP addresses. It features functionality like IP address assignment, IP address reservations, and automated workflows.

Key Features Comparison

phpIPAM Features

• IP address management
• Subnet management
• VLAN management
• DHCP server management
• DNS server management
• User and group management
• REST API

NIPAP Features

• IP address management
• Subnet management
• VLAN management
• Prefix delegation
• IP address reservations
• Automated workflows
• REST API
• Command line interface

Pros & Cons Analysis

phpIPAM

Pros

• Open source
• Easy to use web interface
• Scales to mid-size networks
• Integrates with LDAP/AD
• REST API for automation

Cons

• Lacks some features of commercial IPAM tools
• Can be complex for very large networks
• Limited native integrations

NIPAP

Pros

• Open source
• Flexible and customizable
• Scalable for large networks
• Automates tedious IPAM tasks
• Integrates with existing systems
• Good documentation

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Limited adoption and community support
• Not as feature rich as commercial solutions
• Requires self-hosting and maintenance

Pricing Comparison

phpIPAM

• Open Source

NIPAP

• Open Source