Piskel vs Aseprite

Struggling to choose between Piskel and Aseprite? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Piskel is a Photos & Graphics solution with tags like pixel-art, sprite-editor, animation, gif, layers, onion-skinning.

It boasts features such as Pixel art editor, Layers and frames, Onion skinning, Palette support, Export animations as GIF or spritesheet and pros including Free and open source, Intuitive interface, Active community support, Cross-platform - works on desktop and mobile browsers, Ideal for game developers, pixel artists and animators.

On the other hand, Aseprite is a Photos & Graphics product tagged with pixel-art, sprite-animation, 2d-graphics, game-art.

Its standout features include Pixel art editing, Animation timeline, Onion skinning, Layers and tags, Palette management, Tiled mode, Export animations and spritesheets, and it shines with pros like Specialized for pixel art, Powerful animation tools, Active development and community, Cross-platform support.

Feature	Piskel	Aseprite
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Photos & Graphics	Photos & Graphics

Product Overview

Piskel

Description: Piskel is a free online editor for sprites and pixel art. It allows users to easily create animated sprites and pixel art with a simple interface and tools like layers, palettes, onion skinning, and export animations as GIFs or spritesheets.

Aseprite

Description: Aseprite is a pixel art and sprite animation software for creating 2D game graphics. It has tools for digital painting, layers, timeline animation, palette management, and exporting animations to game engines.

Key Features Comparison

Piskel Features

• Pixel art editor
• Layers and frames
• Onion skinning
• Palette support
• Export animations as GIF or spritesheet

Aseprite Features

• Pixel art editing
• Animation timeline
• Onion skinning
• Layers and tags
• Palette management
• Tiled mode
• Export animations and spritesheets

Pros & Cons Analysis

Piskel

Pros

• Free and open source
• Intuitive interface
• Active community support
• Cross-platform - works on desktop and mobile browsers
• Ideal for game developers, pixel artists and animators

Cons

• Limited features compared to desktop pixel art software
• File size limitations for exports
• Less control over animation compared to other tools
• Can be slow on lower end devices

Aseprite

Pros

• Specialized for pixel art
• Powerful animation tools
• Active development and community
• Cross-platform support

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• No vector tools
• Limited native file format support
• Can be resource intensive

Pricing Comparison

Piskel

• Free
• Open Source

Aseprite

• Freemium
• One-time Purchase