Pixlr-o-matic vs AfterLight

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

Pixlr-o-matic icon
Pixlr-o-matic
AfterLight icon
AfterLight

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between Pixlr-o-matic and AfterLight? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Pixlr-o-matic is a Photos & Graphics solution with tags like photo, editing, filters, effects, overlays, adjustments.

It boasts features such as Filters and overlays, Adjustments, Easy-to-use interface, Variety of effects and pros including Free to use, Intuitive user interface, Wide range of editing tools and effects, Accessible from any device with an internet connection.

On the other hand, AfterLight is a Photos & Graphics product tagged with photo, editor, editing, adjustments, effects, cropping, casual.

Its standout features include Cropping, Color adjustments, Photo effects, Sharing photos, Layer support, Batch editing, RAW photo support, and it shines with pros like Free and open source, Easy to use interface, Available on Windows, Mac and Linux, Supports common image formats like JPEG, PNG, GIF, Basic editing tools for casual users.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare Pixlr-o-matic and AfterLight?

When evaluating Pixlr-o-matic versus AfterLight, both solutions serve different needs within the photos & graphics ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

Pixlr-o-matic and AfterLight have established themselves in the photos & graphics market. Key areas include photo, editing, filters.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between Pixlr-o-matic and AfterLight significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include photo, editing, filters, effects.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include photo, editing and photo, editor.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between Pixlr-o-matic and AfterLight. You might also explore photo, editing, filters for alternative approaches.

Feature Pixlr-o-matic AfterLight
Overall Score N/A N/A
Primary Category Photos & Graphics Photos & Graphics
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

Pixlr-o-matic
Pixlr-o-matic

Description: Pixlr-o-matic is a free online photo editor that allows users to quickly apply filters, overlays, and adjustments to images. It has an easy-to-use interface and a variety of effects to choose from.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

AfterLight
AfterLight

Description: AfterLight is a free, open-source photo editor for Windows, Mac and Linux. It provides basic editing tools for cropping, color adjustments, effects and sharing photos. An easy-to-use interface makes it great for casual photo editing.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

Pixlr-o-matic
Pixlr-o-matic Features
  • Filters and overlays
  • Adjustments
  • Easy-to-use interface
  • Variety of effects
AfterLight
AfterLight Features
  • Cropping
  • Color adjustments
  • Photo effects
  • Sharing photos
  • Layer support
  • Batch editing
  • RAW photo support

Pros & Cons Analysis

Pixlr-o-matic
Pixlr-o-matic
Pros
  • Free to use
  • Intuitive user interface
  • Wide range of editing tools and effects
  • Accessible from any device with an internet connection
Cons
  • Limited advanced editing features compared to desktop photo editors
  • Requires an internet connection to use
  • Limited storage and export options in the free version
AfterLight
AfterLight
Pros
  • Free and open source
  • Easy to use interface
  • Available on Windows, Mac and Linux
  • Supports common image formats like JPEG, PNG, GIF
  • Basic editing tools for casual users
Cons
  • Limited advanced editing capabilities
  • Fewer features than paid alternatives
  • Lacks some organization features like keyword tagging
  • No plugin support

Pricing Comparison

Pixlr-o-matic
Pixlr-o-matic
  • Free
  • Freemium
AfterLight
AfterLight
  • Free
  • Open Source

Get More Information

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs