Plastic SCM vs Apache Subversion

Struggling to choose between Plastic SCM and Apache Subversion? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Plastic SCM is a Development solution with tags like source-control, git, mercurial, svn, versioning.

It boasts features such as Distributed version control, High performance, Flexible branching models, Integrates with IDEs like Visual Studio, Supports Windows, Linux and Mac and pros including Very fast and scalable, Powerful merging capabilities, Easy to set up and use, Good integration with IDEs, Cross-platform support.

On the other hand, Apache Subversion is a Development product tagged with open-source, version-control, source-code-management.

Its standout features include Version control system, Allows managing file revisions and history, Supports branching and merging, Distributed architecture allows working offline, Access control and permissions management, and it shines with pros like Free and open source, Wide platform support (Windows, Linux, macOS), Integrates with popular IDEs, Strong community support, Very stable and reliable.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.