Plastic SCM vs Apache Subversion

Struggling to choose between Plastic SCM and Apache Subversion? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Plastic SCM is a Development solution with tags like source-control, git, mercurial, svn, versioning.

It boasts features such as Distributed version control, High performance, Flexible branching models, Integrates with IDEs like Visual Studio, Supports Windows, Linux and Mac and pros including Very fast and scalable, Powerful merging capabilities, Easy to set up and use, Good integration with IDEs, Cross-platform support.

On the other hand, Apache Subversion is a Development product tagged with open-source, version-control, source-code-management.

Its standout features include Version control system, Allows managing file revisions and history, Supports branching and merging, Distributed architecture allows working offline, Access control and permissions management, and it shines with pros like Free and open source, Wide platform support (Windows, Linux, macOS), Integrates with popular IDEs, Strong community support, Very stable and reliable.

Feature	Plastic SCM	Apache Subversion
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

Plastic SCM

Description: Plastic SCM is a distributed version control system designed for teams of developers working on Windows, Linux and Mac. It focuses on performance, security, flexibility and ease of use.

Apache Subversion

Description: Apache Subversion is an open source version control system. It allows users to maintain current and historical versions of files such as source code, web pages, and documentation. Popular among developers and used by corporations to manage large projects.

Key Features Comparison

Plastic SCM Features

• Distributed version control
• High performance
• Flexible branching models
• Integrates with IDEs like Visual Studio
• Supports Windows, Linux and Mac

Apache Subversion Features

• Version control system
• Allows managing file revisions and history
• Supports branching and merging
• Distributed architecture allows working offline
• Access control and permissions management

Pros & Cons Analysis

Plastic SCM

Pros

• Very fast and scalable
• Powerful merging capabilities
• Easy to set up and use
• Good integration with IDEs
• Cross-platform support

Cons

• Less flexible than Git
• Weaker community than Git
• Proprietary license

Apache Subversion

Pros

• Free and open source
• Wide platform support (Windows, Linux, macOS)
• Integrates with popular IDEs
• Strong community support
• Very stable and reliable

Cons

• Not as fast as Git for very large projects
• Learning curve for advanced features
• No built-in GUI client
• Not ideal for distributed teams

Pricing Comparison

Plastic SCM

• Free
• Subscription-Based

Apache Subversion

• Open Source