Plastic SCM vs Microsoft Visual SourceSafe

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

Plastic SCM icon
Plastic SCM
Microsoft Visual SourceSafe icon
Microsoft Visual SourceSafe

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between Plastic SCM and Microsoft Visual SourceSafe? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Plastic SCM is a Development solution with tags like source-control, git, mercurial, svn, versioning.

It boasts features such as Distributed version control, High performance, Flexible branching models, Integrates with IDEs like Visual Studio, Supports Windows, Linux and Mac and pros including Very fast and scalable, Powerful merging capabilities, Easy to set up and use, Good integration with IDEs, Cross-platform support.

On the other hand, Microsoft Visual SourceSafe is a Development product tagged with source-code, versioning, multiuser.

Its standout features include Version control system for source code, Check-in/check-out capabilities, Version history and ability to roll back changes, Multi-user access with security controls, Integration with Visual Studio IDE, File locking to prevent conflicts, Branching and merging support, Centralized repository, and it shines with pros like Easy to learn and use, Tight integration with Microsoft ecosystem, Good performance for small to midsize teams, Handles text files well, Low cost compared to other commercial options.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare Plastic SCM and Microsoft Visual SourceSafe?

When evaluating Plastic SCM versus Microsoft Visual SourceSafe, both solutions serve different needs within the development ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

Plastic SCM and Microsoft Visual SourceSafe have established themselves in the development market. Key areas include source-control, git, mercurial.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between Plastic SCM and Microsoft Visual SourceSafe significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include source-control, git, mercurial, svn.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include source-control, git and source-code, versioning.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between Plastic SCM and Microsoft Visual SourceSafe. You might also explore source-control, git, mercurial for alternative approaches.

Feature Plastic SCM Microsoft Visual SourceSafe
Overall Score N/A N/A
Primary Category Development Development
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

Plastic SCM
Plastic SCM

Description: Plastic SCM is a distributed version control system designed for teams of developers working on Windows, Linux and Mac. It focuses on performance, security, flexibility and ease of use.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

Microsoft Visual SourceSafe
Microsoft Visual SourceSafe

Description: Microsoft Visual SourceSafe is a version control system that allows software teams to manage source code changes. It provides versioning, check-in/check-out capabilities, and supports multi-user access.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

Plastic SCM
Plastic SCM Features
  • Distributed version control
  • High performance
  • Flexible branching models
  • Integrates with IDEs like Visual Studio
  • Supports Windows, Linux and Mac
Microsoft Visual SourceSafe
Microsoft Visual SourceSafe Features
  • Version control system for source code
  • Check-in/check-out capabilities
  • Version history and ability to roll back changes
  • Multi-user access with security controls
  • Integration with Visual Studio IDE
  • File locking to prevent conflicts
  • Branching and merging support
  • Centralized repository

Pros & Cons Analysis

Plastic SCM
Plastic SCM
Pros
  • Very fast and scalable
  • Powerful merging capabilities
  • Easy to set up and use
  • Good integration with IDEs
  • Cross-platform support
Cons
  • Less flexible than Git
  • Weaker community than Git
  • Proprietary license
Microsoft Visual SourceSafe
Microsoft Visual SourceSafe
Pros
  • Easy to learn and use
  • Tight integration with Microsoft ecosystem
  • Good performance for small to midsize teams
  • Handles text files well
  • Low cost compared to other commercial options
Cons
  • Limited scalability for large projects/teams
  • No distributed version control support
  • Less robust merging and branching capabilities
  • Proprietary lock-in to Microsoft stack
  • No longer under active development

Pricing Comparison

Plastic SCM
Plastic SCM
  • Free
  • Subscription-Based
Microsoft Visual SourceSafe
Microsoft Visual SourceSafe
  • One-time Purchase
  • Subscription-Based (for some versions)

Get More Information

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs