Pleroma vs GNU social

Struggling to choose between Pleroma and GNU social? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Pleroma is a Social & Communications solution with tags like fediverse, activitypub, social-network, open-source.

It boasts features such as ActivityPub federation, Real-time chat, Media attachments, Hashtags, Follow/unfollow, Replies and mentions, Custom emojis, User profiles, Content warnings and pros including Open source and self-hostable, Lightweight and fast, Decentralized, Customizable, No ads or algorithmic feeds.

On the other hand, GNU social is a Social & Communications product tagged with decentralized, open-source, privacy, twittercompatible.

Its standout features include Decentralized social network, User data privacy and control, Open protocols and APIs, Interoperability with Twitter, Media embedding, Hashtags, Groups and lists, Notifications, and it shines with pros like User data privacy, No central authority, Open source and transparent, Interoperable with other networks, Free to use.

Feature	Pleroma	GNU social
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Social & Communications	Social & Communications

Product Overview

Pleroma

Description: Pleroma is an open-source social networking platform built on the ActivityPub protocol. It is designed to be lightweight, fast, and easy to self-host as an alternative to corporate social media platforms.

GNU social

Description: GNU social is a free and open source social networking platform. It is designed to be decentralized and enable users to control their own data instead of having it stored on corporate servers. It is compatible with Twitter to allow seamless communication across platforms.

Key Features Comparison

Pleroma Features

• ActivityPub federation
• Real-time chat
• Media attachments
• Hashtags
• Follow/unfollow
• Replies and mentions
• Custom emojis
• User profiles
• Content warnings

GNU social Features

• Decentralized social network
• User data privacy and control
• Open protocols and APIs
• Interoperability with Twitter
• Media embedding
• Hashtags
• Groups and lists
• Notifications

Pros & Cons Analysis

Pleroma

Pros

• Open source and self-hostable
• Lightweight and fast
• Decentralized
• Customizable
• No ads or algorithmic feeds

Cons

• Smaller user base than mainstream platforms
• Requires technical expertise to self-host
• Less features than larger platforms initially
• Can be resource intensive to host

GNU social

Pros

• User data privacy
• No central authority
• Open source and transparent
• Interoperable with other networks
• Free to use

Cons

• Smaller user base than mainstream networks
• Requires some technical knowledge to set up and use
• Limited features compared to larger networks
• Not beginner friendly

Pricing Comparison

Pleroma

• Open Source

GNU social

• Open Source
• Free