Propellor vs Bcfg2

Struggling to choose between Propellor and Bcfg2? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Propellor is a Development solution with tags like opensource, haskell, configuration-management, deployment.

It boasts features such as Declarative configuration language, Idempotent system configuration, Manages hosts and services, Written in Haskell and pros including Declarative syntax makes configurations easy to read and maintain, Being purely functional avoids side effects and ensures reproducibility, Type safety prevents many errors.

On the other hand, Bcfg2 is a Network & Admin product tagged with configuration-management, drift-detection, desired-state.

Its standout features include Configuration management, Managing large server environments, Automated configuration monitoring, Detect and correct configuration drift, Declarative configuration modeling, Integration with Puppet, Chef, etc, Plugin architecture, and it shines with pros like Powerful configuration modeling, Scales to large environments, Detects and fixes drift, Integrates with other tools, Open source and free.

Feature	Propellor	Bcfg2
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Network & Admin

Product Overview

Propellor

Description: Propellor is an open-source configuration management tool written in Haskell. It uses a declarative domain-specific language to define system configurations, allowing developers to manage and deploy hosts and services with a high-level syntax.

Bcfg2

Description: Bcfg2 is an open-source configuration management system that helps administrators maintain an overview of the configuration of many computers. It allows defining desired configuration states and automatically correcting any detected differences or 'drift'.

Key Features Comparison

Propellor Features

• Declarative configuration language
• Idempotent system configuration
• Manages hosts and services
• Written in Haskell

Bcfg2 Features

• Configuration management
• Managing large server environments
• Automated configuration monitoring
• Detect and correct configuration drift
• Declarative configuration modeling
• Integration with Puppet, Chef, etc
• Plugin architecture

Pros & Cons Analysis

Propellor

Pros

• Declarative syntax makes configurations easy to read and maintain
• Being purely functional avoids side effects and ensures reproducibility
• Type safety prevents many errors

Cons

• Steep learning curve for Haskell syntax
• Limited adoption outside of Haskell community

Bcfg2

Pros

• Powerful configuration modeling
• Scales to large environments
• Detects and fixes drift
• Integrates with other tools
• Open source and free

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Less flexible than pure scripting
• Limited adoption compared to Puppet/Chef/Ansible
• No commercial support available

Pricing Comparison

Propellor

• Open Source

Bcfg2

• Open Source