Protractor vs Cypress.io

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

Protractor icon
Protractor
Cypress.io icon
Cypress.io

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between Protractor and Cypress.io? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Protractor is a Development solution with tags like endtoend-testing, angular, javascript.

It boasts features such as Supports Angular and AngularJS applications, Runs tests against application in real browser, Interacts with application like an actual user, Uses Jasmine framework for writing tests, Integrates with Selenium WebDriver, Provides automatic waiting and synchronization, Supports Page Object Model and pros including Easy to set up and get started, Open source and free to use, Active community support, Supports multiple browsers, Helps write stable and reliable UI tests.

On the other hand, Cypress.io is a Development product tagged with endtoend-testing, unit-testing, integration-testing, automation.

Its standout features include Runs tests directly in the browser, Time travel debugging, Automatic waiting and retries, Screenshots and videos, Network traffic control, Spies, stubs and clocks, Command log, Cross browser testing, Parallelization, and it shines with pros like Easy to set up, Intuitive API, Fast and reliable tests, Detailed error messages, Built-in assertions, Open source.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare Protractor and Cypress.io?

When evaluating Protractor versus Cypress.io, both solutions serve different needs within the development ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

Protractor and Cypress.io have established themselves in the development market. Key areas include endtoend-testing, angular, javascript.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between Protractor and Cypress.io significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include endtoend-testing, angular, javascript.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include endtoend-testing, angular and endtoend-testing, unit-testing.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between Protractor and Cypress.io. You might also explore endtoend-testing, angular, javascript for alternative approaches.

Feature Protractor Cypress.io
Overall Score N/A 1
Primary Category Development Development
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

Protractor
Protractor

Description: Protractor is an end-to-end test framework for Angular and AngularJS applications. It runs tests against your application running in a real browser, interacting with it as a user would.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

Cypress.io
Cypress.io

Description: Cypress.io is an open source, front end testing tool built for the modern web. It allows you to write automated tests for your web applications in a simple and scalable way, handling complex tasks like end-to-end testing, unit testing, integration testing etc. Cypress runs directly in the browser for faster and more reliable tests.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

Protractor
Protractor Features
  • Supports Angular and AngularJS applications
  • Runs tests against application in real browser
  • Interacts with application like an actual user
  • Uses Jasmine framework for writing tests
  • Integrates with Selenium WebDriver
  • Provides automatic waiting and synchronization
  • Supports Page Object Model
Cypress.io
Cypress.io Features
  • Runs tests directly in the browser
  • Time travel debugging
  • Automatic waiting and retries
  • Screenshots and videos
  • Network traffic control
  • Spies, stubs and clocks
  • Command log
  • Cross browser testing
  • Parallelization

Pros & Cons Analysis

Protractor
Protractor
Pros
  • Easy to set up and get started
  • Open source and free to use
  • Active community support
  • Supports multiple browsers
  • Helps write stable and reliable UI tests
Cons
  • Steep learning curve
  • Only works with Angular apps
  • Difficult to debug failures
  • Brittle locators can cause flaky tests
Cypress.io
Cypress.io
Pros
  • Easy to set up
  • Intuitive API
  • Fast and reliable tests
  • Detailed error messages
  • Built-in assertions
  • Open source
Cons
  • Only supports JavaScript tests
  • Limited support for older browsers
  • Steep learning curve for advanced features

Pricing Comparison

Protractor
Protractor
  • Open Source
Cypress.io
Cypress.io
  • Open Source

Get More Information

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs